Suppr超能文献

一项前瞻性随机研究,比较奎奴普丁-达福普汀与利奈唑胺治疗耐万古霉素屎肠球菌感染的疗效。

Prospective, randomized study comparing quinupristin-dalfopristin with linezolid in the treatment of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium infections.

作者信息

Raad Issam, Hachem Ray, Hanna Hend, Afif Claude, Escalante Carmen, Kantarjian Hagop, Rolston Kenneth

机构信息

Departments of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control and Employee Health, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Texas 77030, USA.

出版信息

J Antimicrob Chemother. 2004 Apr;53(4):646-9. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkh144. Epub 2004 Mar 3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Quinupristin-dalfopristin and linezolid have been shown to be efficacious in the treatment of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREF) infections. However, the two antibiotics have not been compared in terms of safety and efficacy in a prospective randomized study. The objective of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of the two drugs in the treatment of VREF infections in cancer patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty cancer patients with VREF infection were randomized to receive linezolid 600 mg every 12 h or quinupristin-dalfopristin 7.5 mg/kg every 8 h. All patients were followed up for 30 days after discontinuation of study drugs.

RESULTS

Linezolid and quinupristin-dalfopristin had comparable clinical responses (58% and 43%, respectively, P = 0.6). Myalgias and/or arthralgias occurred at a frequency of 33% in patients who received quinupristin-dalfopristin, but were not observed in the linezolid group (P = 0.03). In contrast, drug-related thrombocytopenia occurred in 11% of patients who received linezolid, but was not observed in the quinupristin-dalfopristin group (P = 0.2).

CONCLUSION

In cancer patients, quinupristin-dalfopristin treatment is associated with a relatively high frequency of myalgias/arthralgias; however, profound thrombocytopenia might limit the choice of linezolid in a subpopulation of cancer patients.

摘要

目的

已证明奎奴普丁-达福普汀和利奈唑胺在治疗耐万古霉素屎肠球菌(VREF)感染方面有效。然而,这两种抗生素尚未在前瞻性随机研究中就安全性和疗效进行比较。本研究的目的是比较这两种药物治疗癌症患者VREF感染的安全性和疗效。

患者与方法

40例患有VREF感染的癌症患者被随机分为两组,一组每12小时接受600毫克利奈唑胺治疗,另一组每8小时接受7.5毫克/千克奎奴普丁-达福普汀治疗。所有患者在停用研究药物后随访30天。

结果

利奈唑胺和奎奴普丁-达福普汀的临床反应相当(分别为58%和43%,P = )。接受奎奴普丁-达福普汀治疗的患者中,肌痛和/或关节痛的发生率为33%,而利奈唑胺组未观察到(P = 0.03)。相反,接受利奈唑胺治疗的患者中有11%出现与药物相关的血小板减少症,而奎奴普丁-达福普汀组未观察到(P = 0.2)。

结论

在癌症患者中,奎奴普丁-达福普汀治疗与较高频率的肌痛/关节痛相关;然而,严重血小板减少症可能会限制利奈唑胺在部分癌症患者中的选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验