Quenon J-L, Eveillard M, Vivien A, Bourderont D, Lepape A, Lathelize M, Jestin C
Santé Publique, Faculté Xavier Bichat, Paris, France.
J Hosp Infect. 2004 Mar;56(3):202-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2003.11.005.
Deep wound infection is a rare but dreaded postoperative complication after total hip prosthesis (THP) procedures but its incidence can be reduced by systemic antimicrobial prophylaxis. The objective of the present study was to evaluate whether antimicrobial prophylaxis for elective primary THP in patients without any history of hip infection, in orthopaedic wards, participating on a voluntary basis, in French public hospitals and private institutions, complies with published guidelines. Three types of data were collected from anaesthetic and surgical records (November 2000-January 2001) in participating hospitals: (1) administrative data on the hospitals and orthopaedic wards, (2) data on patients, (3) data on compliance of practices with five critical criteria derived from published French guidelines. These criteria concerned administration of prophylaxis, choice of antimicrobial agent, dose of first injection, timing of administration and total length of prophylaxis. Thirty institutions sent data files on 1257 THPs to the coordination centre. Compliance exceeded 80% for all criteria except one (interval between first and second injection). Cumulative compliance with the five criteria was 66.9%. Major compliance failures were an inappropriate interval between the first injection and incision, and total antimicrobial prophylaxis exceeding 48 h. Cumulative compliance was 87.9% in teaching hospitals, 61.8% in general hospitals and 67.7% in private institutions (P<1 x 10(-6)). It was slightly higher when the annual number of interventions was > or =100 (69.4 versus 62.3%; P<0.02). Although the protocol for antimicrobial prophylaxis in THP was clear and easy, one-third of practices did not conform with all five standards. Knowledge of the results by the participating institutions should encourage them to set up working groups to draft care protocols for THP and other surgical interventions, in order to improve practice and perhaps reduce costs.
深部伤口感染是全髋关节置换术(THP)后一种罕见但可怕的术后并发症,不过通过全身抗菌预防可降低其发生率。本研究的目的是评估在法国公立医院和私立机构中,在骨科病房自愿参与的、无髋关节感染病史的患者进行择期初次THP时,抗菌预防措施是否符合已发表的指南。从参与研究的医院的麻醉和手术记录(2000年11月至2001年1月)中收集了三种类型的数据:(1)关于医院和骨科病房的管理数据,(2)患者数据,(3)关于实践符合从已发表的法国指南中得出的五个关键标准的数据。这些标准涉及预防用药的使用、抗菌药物的选择、首次注射剂量、给药时间和预防用药的总时长。30家机构将1257例THP的数据文件发送至协调中心。除一项标准(首次和第二次注射之间的间隔)外,所有标准的合规率均超过80%。五项标准的累积合规率为66.9%。主要的合规失败情况是首次注射与切口之间的间隔不当,以及抗菌预防总时长超过48小时。教学医院的累积合规率为87.9%,综合医院为61.8%,私立机构为67.7%(P<1×10⁻⁶)。当年干预次数≥100时,累积合规率略高(69.4%对62.3%;P<0.02)。尽管THP抗菌预防方案清晰易懂,但仍有三分之一的实践不符合所有五项标准。参与机构了解结果后应鼓励他们成立工作组,为THP及其他手术干预制定护理方案,以改进实践并可能降低成本。