Suppr超能文献

一项关于在基于计算机的慢性心力衰竭患者管理护理建议中纳入症状数据的对照试验。

A controlled trial of including symptom data in computer-based care suggestions for managing patients with chronic heart failure.

作者信息

Subramanian Usha, Fihn Stephan D, Weinberger Morris, Plue Laurie, Smith Faye E, Udris Edmunds M, McDonell Mary B, Eckert George J, Temkit M'Hamed, Zhou Xiao-Hua, Chen Leway, Tierney William M

机构信息

Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.

出版信息

Am J Med. 2004 Mar 15;116(6):375-84. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2003.11.021.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Heart failure is common and associated with considerable morbidity and cost, yet physician adherence to treatment guidelines is suboptimal. We conducted a randomized controlled study to determine if adding symptom information to evidence-based, computer-generated care suggestions would affect treatment decisions among primary care physicians caring for outpatients with heart failure at two Veterans Affairs medical centers.

METHODS

Physicians were randomly assigned to receive either care suggestions generated with electronic medical record data and symptom data obtained from questionnaires mailed to patients within 2 weeks of scheduled outpatient visits (intervention group) or suggestions generated with electronic medical record data alone (control group). Patients had to have a diagnosis of heart failure and objective evidence of left ventricular systolic dysfunction. We assessed physician adherence to heart failure guidelines, as well as patients' New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, quality of life, satisfaction with care, hospitalizations, and outpatient visits, at 6 and 12 months after enrollment.

RESULTS

Patients in the intervention (n = 355) and control (n = 365) groups were similar at baseline. At 12 months, there were no significant differences in adherence to care suggestions between physicians in the intervention and control groups (33% vs. 30%, P = 0.4). There were also no significant changes in NYHA class (P = 0.1) and quality-of-life measures (P >0.1), as well as no differences in the number of outpatient visits between intervention and control patients (6.7 vs. 7.1 visits, P = 0.48). Intervention patients were more satisfied with their physicians (P = 0.02) and primary care visit (P = 0.02), but had more all-cause hospitalizations at 6 months (1.5 vs. 0.7 hospitalizations, P = 0.0002) and 12 months (2.3 vs. 1.7 hospitalizations, P = 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Adding symptom information to computer-generated care suggestions for patients with heart failure did not affect physician treatment decisions or improve patient outcomes.

摘要

背景

心力衰竭很常见,且伴有相当高的发病率和成本,但医生对治疗指南的遵循情况并不理想。我们进行了一项随机对照研究,以确定在基于证据的、计算机生成的护理建议中添加症状信息是否会影响在两家退伍军人事务医疗中心为门诊心力衰竭患者提供治疗的初级保健医生的治疗决策。

方法

医生被随机分配接受以下两种建议之一:一种是根据电子病历数据以及在预定门诊就诊前2周内邮寄给患者的问卷所获得的症状数据生成的护理建议(干预组),另一种是仅根据电子病历数据生成的建议(对照组)。患者必须已被诊断为心力衰竭且有左心室收缩功能障碍的客观证据。我们在入组后的6个月和12个月评估了医生对心力衰竭指南的遵循情况,以及患者的纽约心脏协会(NYHA)分级、生活质量、对护理的满意度、住院情况和门诊就诊情况。

结果

干预组(n = 355)和对照组(n = 365)的患者在基线时相似。在12个月时,干预组和对照组医生对护理建议的遵循情况没有显著差异(33%对30%,P = 0.4)。NYHA分级(P = 0.1)和生活质量指标(P >0.1)也没有显著变化,干预组和对照组患者的门诊就诊次数也没有差异(6.7次对7.1次就诊,P = 0.48)。干预组患者对其医生(P = 0.02)和初级保健就诊(P = 0.02)更满意,但在6个月时全因住院次数更多(1.5次对0.7次住院,P = 0.0002),在12个月时也是如此(2.3次对1.7次住院,P = 0.05)。

结论

在为心力衰竭患者计算机生成的护理建议中添加症状信息并未影响医生的治疗决策或改善患者预后。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验