Muller-Serieys C, Drugeon H B, Etienne J, Lascols C, Leclercq R, Nguyen J, Soussy C J
Laboratoire de Bactériologie, Groupe Hospitalier Bichat-Claide Bernard, Paris, France.
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2004 Mar;10(3):242-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1198-743x.2004.00751.x.
In total, 844 strains of Gram-positive cocci were collected from six university hospitals in France between September 1999 and January 2000. MICs of linezolid were determined: (i) for all strains by agar dilution (method A); (ii) by broth microdilution (method B) for staphylococci and enterococci; (iii) by Etest (method E) for beta-haemolytic streptococci and Streptococcus pneumoniae. Susceptibility to other antibiotics was determined by the disk diffusion method. MIC50 and MIC90 values were identical (2 mg/L) for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (n = 179) by methods A and B. Linezolid was active against methicillin-resistant S. aureus (n = 117), with an MIC90 of 2 mg/L (methods A and B), but with a lower MIC50 of 1 mg/L by method A. Of the 200 coagulase-negative staphylococci, 56.5% were methicillin-resistant and 43.5% were methicillin-susceptible. Linezolid had similar in-vitro activity by methods A and B (MIC50 and MIC90 values of 1-2 mg/L), irrespective of methicillin susceptibility. The MIC90 of linezolid for all enterococci (150 Enterococcus faecalis and 50 Enterococcus faecium) was 2 mg/L by both methods. MICs of linezolid for beta-haemolytic streptococci had a narrow range of 0.5-2 mg/L (method A) and 0.125-2 mg/L (method E). Pneumococci (n = 118), including 67 penicillin G-intermediate and -resistant strains, were all inhibited by linezolid 2 mg/L (MIC90 of 2 mg/L by methods A and E). No strain had an MIC of > 2 mg/L by agar dilution or Etest, or of > 4 mg/L by broth microdilution. Overall, the study confirmed the good in-vitro activity of linezolid and the very narrow range of MICs for Gram-positive cocci susceptible or resistant to other antibiotics, irrespective of the method used.
1999年9月至2000年1月期间,从法国的六所大学医院共收集了844株革兰氏阳性球菌。测定了利奈唑胺的最低抑菌浓度(MIC):(i)对所有菌株采用琼脂稀释法(方法A);(ii)对葡萄球菌和肠球菌采用肉汤微量稀释法(方法B);(iii)对β溶血性链球菌和肺炎链球菌采用Etest法(方法E)。通过纸片扩散法测定对其他抗生素的敏感性。对于甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌(n = 179),方法A和方法B的MIC50和MIC90值相同(2mg/L)。利奈唑胺对耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(n = 117)有活性,MIC90为2mg/L(方法A和方法B),但方法A的MIC50较低,为1mg/L。在200株凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌中,56.5%为耐甲氧西林菌株,43.5%为甲氧西林敏感菌株。无论甲氧西林敏感性如何,利奈唑胺通过方法A和方法B具有相似的体外活性(MIC50和MIC90值为1 - 2mg/L)。两种方法测定利奈唑胺对所有肠球菌(150株粪肠球菌和50株屎肠球菌)的MIC90均为2mg/L。利奈唑胺对β溶血性链球菌的MIC范围较窄,为0.5 - 2mg/L(方法A)和0.125 - 2mg/L(方法E)。肺炎球菌(n = 118),包括67株对青霉素G中度耐药和耐药菌株,均被2mg/L利奈唑胺抑制(方法A和方法E的MIC90为2mg/L)。通过琼脂稀释法或Etest法,没有菌株的MIC > 2mg/L,通过肉汤微量稀释法没有菌株的MIC > 4mg/L。总体而言,该研究证实了利奈唑胺良好的体外活性以及对于对其他抗生素敏感或耐药的革兰氏阳性球菌,其MIC范围非常窄,且与所使用的方法无关。