Loue Sana
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Rev Rom Bioet. 2003 Jan-Mar;1(1):55-88.
The law and policy relating to the civil commitment of mentally ill persons in the United States and Romania are currently undergoing significant changes. While many jurisdictions in the United States are moving towards increasing emphasis on various forms of outpatient civil commitment, Romania is contemplating a restructuring of its commitment procedures to conform to international principles of human rights and to resemble more closely the United States model of commitment and care. A comparison of the procedures and standards for the involuntary civil commitment of mentally ill persons under each system is, consequently, timely. This article begins with a discussion of how mental illness is defined and identified clinically in a cross-cultural context. The article then examines the legal meaning of mental illness in the civil context in the United States and Romania, focusing on the implications of these meanings for the civil commitment of persons deemed to be mentally ill. Current models, standards, and procedures for the civil commitment of persons deemed to be mentally ill are described, using schizophrenia as a case example. The article concludes with an analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of each system and the arguments that provide the basis for the current reform efforts.
美国和罗马尼亚与精神病患者民事收容相关的法律和政策目前正在经历重大变革。在美国,许多司法管辖区正朝着更加重视各种形式的门诊民事收容的方向发展,而罗马尼亚则在考虑对其收容程序进行重组,以符合国际人权原则,并更接近美国的收容和护理模式。因此,对每个体系下精神病患者非自愿民事收容的程序和标准进行比较是适时的。本文首先讨论在跨文化背景下如何从临床角度定义和识别精神疾病。然后,本文考察了美国和罗马尼亚民事背景下精神疾病的法律含义,重点关注这些含义对被认定为患有精神疾病者民事收容的影响。以精神分裂症为例,描述了当前被认定为患有精神疾病者民事收容的模式、标准和程序。文章最后分析了每个体系的优缺点以及为当前改革努力提供依据的论点。