Xu Jian-Guang, Gu Yu-Dong, Wang Huan, Hu Shao-Nan, Yong Chen Zheng
Department of Hand Surgery, Hua Shan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, P.R. China.
Microsurgery. 2004;24(2):143-6. doi: 10.1002/micr.20012.
The treatment outcome of nerve transfer using the C7 nerve root or phrenic nerve was compared in a rat experiment. One hundred and twenty SD rats were divided into two groups, one undergoing phrenic nerve transfer to the musculocutaneous nerve, and the other partial ipsilateral C7 (anteriolateral fascicles of the anterior division) to the musculocutaneous nerve. Neurotization outcomes of the two groups were evaluated by comparing the electrophysiologic, histologic, and myophysiologic changes of the biceps muscle. No significant differences were found between parameters from the phrenic nerve transfer group and those from the ipsilateral C7 nerve transfer group. This indicates that the treatment outcome of selective ipsilateral C7 transfer is comparable to that of phrenic nerve transfer. It is the surgery of choice in treating brachial plexus upper-trunk avulsion accompanied by phrenic nerve injury.
在一项大鼠实验中比较了使用C7神经根或膈神经进行神经移植的治疗效果。120只SD大鼠被分为两组,一组将膈神经移植至肌皮神经,另一组将同侧部分C7(前支的前外侧束)移植至肌皮神经。通过比较肱二头肌的电生理、组织学和肌生理变化来评估两组的神经再生效果。膈神经移植组和同侧C7神经移植组的参数之间未发现显著差异。这表明选择性同侧C7移植的治疗效果与膈神经移植相当。它是治疗伴有膈神经损伤的臂丛上干撕脱伤的首选手术方法。