• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人乳头瘤病毒DNA检测用于30岁及以上女性宫颈癌筛查的成本效益

Cost-effectiveness of human papillomavirus DNA testing for cervical cancer screening in women aged 30 years or more.

作者信息

Goldie Sue J, Kim Jane J, Wright Thomas C

机构信息

Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts 02115-5924, USA.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Apr;103(4):619-31. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000120143.50098.c7.

DOI:10.1097/01.AOG.0000120143.50098.c7
PMID:15051550
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing as a primary screening test in combination with cervical cytology in women aged 30 years or more.

METHODS

A state-transition mathematical model was used to simulate the natural history of HPV and cervical cancer in a cohort of U.S. women. Strategies included no screening and screening at different frequencies with conventional cytology, liquid-based cytology with HPV testing used for triage of equivocal results, and HPV DNA testing and cytology in combination after women had reached the age of 30. Outcomes measured included cancer incidence, life expectancy, lifetime costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios.

RESULTS

The estimated reduction in lifetime risk of cervical cancer varies from 81% to 93% depending on the screening frequency, type of cytology, and test strategy. Every 3-year screening with liquid-based cytology administered to women at all ages and every 3-year screening using HPV DNA testing and cytology in combination administered to women aged 30 years or more provide equivalent or greater benefits than those provided by annual conventional cytology and have incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of US dollars 95300 and US dollars 228700 per year of life gained, respectively. In comparison, annual screening with HPV DNA testing and cytology in combination provides only a few hours of additional life expectancy and has a cost-effectiveness ratio of more than Us dollars 2000000 per year of life gained.

CONCLUSIONS

For women aged 30 years and more, every 2- or 3-year screening strategy that uses either HPV DNA testing in combination with cytology for primary screening or cytology with reflex HPV DNA testing for equivocal results will provide a greater reduction in cancer and be less costly than annual conventional cytology.

摘要

目的

评估人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)DNA检测作为30岁及以上女性主要筛查检测并联合宫颈细胞学检查的成本效益。

方法

采用状态转换数学模型模拟美国女性队列中HPV和宫颈癌的自然史。策略包括不进行筛查,以及采用不同频率进行常规细胞学检查、液基细胞学检查并使用HPV检测对意义不明确的结果进行分流、女性30岁后联合进行HPV DNA检测和细胞学检查。测量的结果包括癌症发病率、预期寿命、终身成本和增量成本效益比。

结果

根据筛查频率、细胞学类型和检测策略,估计宫颈癌终身风险降低幅度在81%至93%之间。对所有年龄段女性每3年进行一次液基细胞学检查,以及对30岁及以上女性每3年联合进行HPV DNA检测和细胞学检查,与每年进行常规细胞学检查相比,提供了同等或更大的益处,每获得一年生命的增量成本效益比分别为95300美元和228700美元。相比之下,每年联合进行HPV DNA检测和细胞学检查仅能增加几个小时的预期寿命,每获得一年生命的成本效益比超过200万美元。

结论

对于30岁及以上女性,每2年或3年采用HPV DNA检测联合细胞学检查进行初次筛查,或对意义不明确的结果采用细胞学检查并进行HPV DNA检测的筛查策略,将比每年进行常规细胞学检查能更大程度地降低癌症风险且成本更低。

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of human papillomavirus DNA testing for cervical cancer screening in women aged 30 years or more.人乳头瘤病毒DNA检测用于30岁及以上女性宫颈癌筛查的成本效益
Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Apr;103(4):619-31. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000120143.50098.c7.
2
Cost-effectiveness of alternative triage strategies for atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.意义不明确的非典型鳞状细胞的替代分诊策略的成本效益
JAMA. 2002 May 8;287(18):2382-90. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.18.2382.
3
Optimal Management Strategies for Primary HPV Testing for Cervical Screening: Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation for the National Cervical Screening Program in Australia.宫颈癌筛查中初级人乳头瘤病毒检测的最佳管理策略:澳大利亚国家宫颈癌筛查计划的成本效益评估
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 17;12(1):e0163509. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163509. eCollection 2017.
4
Costs and benefits of different strategies to screen for cervical cancer in less-developed countries.欠发达国家宫颈癌不同筛查策略的成本与效益
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002 Oct 2;94(19):1469-83. doi: 10.1093/jnci/94.19.1469.
5
Cost effectiveness of high-risk HPV DNA testing for cervical cancer screening in South Africa.南非高危型人乳头瘤病毒DNA检测用于宫颈癌筛查的成本效益
Gynecol Oncol. 2009 Feb;112(2):377-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.08.030. Epub 2008 Dec 11.
6
Cost-effectiveness of human papillomavirus DNA testing in the United Kingdom, The Netherlands, France, and Italy.人乳头瘤病毒DNA检测在英国、荷兰、法国和意大利的成本效益分析
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005 Jun 15;97(12):888-95. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dji162.
7
Cost-effectiveness of high-risk human papillomavirus testing for cervical cancer screening in Québec, Canada.加拿大魁北克省宫颈癌筛查中高危型人乳头瘤病毒检测的成本效益分析。
Can J Public Health. 2010 May-Jun;101(3):220-5. doi: 10.1007/BF03404377.
8
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of primary human papillomavirus cervical screening in England: extended follow-up of the ARTISTIC randomised trial cohort through three screening rounds.英格兰原发性人乳头瘤病毒子宫颈筛查的临床效果和成本效益:通过三轮筛查对 ARTISTIC 随机试验队列进行的扩展随访。
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Apr;18(23):1-196. doi: 10.3310/hta18230.
9
Projected cost-effectiveness of repeat high-risk human papillomavirus testing using self-collected vaginal samples in the Swedish cervical cancer screening program.基于自我采集阴道样本的重复高危型人乳头瘤病毒检测在瑞典宫颈癌筛查项目中的成本效果预测。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2013 Jul;92(7):830-40. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12143. Epub 2013 Apr 22.
10
Benefits and costs of using HPV testing to screen for cervical cancer.使用人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)检测筛查宫颈癌的益处与成本
JAMA. 2002 May 8;287(18):2372-81. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.18.2372.

引用本文的文献

1
Cervical cancer: Challenges and prevention strategies: A narrative review.宫颈癌:挑战与预防策略:一篇叙述性综述
Health Sci Rep. 2024 May 30;7(6):e2149. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.2149. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
The impact of alternate HPV vaccination and cervical screening strategies in Japan: a cost-effectiveness analysis.日本交替人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)疫苗接种与宫颈癌筛查策略的影响:一项成本效益分析
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2024 Feb 19;44:101018. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2024.101018. eCollection 2024 Mar.
3
The aggregate value of cancer screenings in the United States: full potential value and value considering adherence.
美国癌症筛查的总价值:充分潜力价值和考虑依从性的价值。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Aug 7;23(1):829. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09738-4.
4
Fine-grained mathematical modeling for cost-effectiveness evaluation of public health policies for cervical cancer, with application to a Colombian case study.基于精细化数学模型的宫颈癌公共卫生政策成本效益评估——以哥伦比亚为例的应用研究
BMC Public Health. 2023 Aug 2;23(1):1470. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16022-x.
5
Cost-effectiveness of Check It: A Novel Community-Based Chlamydia Screening and Expedited Treatment Program for Young Black Men.Check It 项目的成本效益:一种新的基于社区的衣原体筛查和加速治疗方案,用于年轻黑人男性。
Clin Infect Dis. 2022 Jul 6;74(12):2166-2172. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab818.
6
Economic evaluation of HPV DNA test as primary screening method for cervical cancer: A health policy discussion in Greece.HPV DNA 测试作为宫颈癌初筛方法的经济学评价:希腊的卫生政策探讨。
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 12;14(12):e0226335. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226335. eCollection 2019.
7
Updated medical care cost estimates for HPV-associated cancers: implications for cost-effectiveness analyses of HPV vaccination in the United States.更新 HPV 相关癌症的医疗费用估计:对美国 HPV 疫苗接种成本效益分析的影响。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2019;15(7-8):1942-1948. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2019.1603562. Epub 2019 May 20.
8
Autonomy Challenges in Epigenetic Risk-Stratified Cancer Screening: How Can Patient Decision Aids Support Informed Consent?表观遗传风险分层癌症筛查中的自主性挑战:患者决策辅助工具如何支持知情同意?
J Pers Med. 2019 Feb 18;9(1):14. doi: 10.3390/jpm9010014.
9
Simple but not simpler: a systematic review of Markov models for economic evaluation of cervical cancer screening.简单但非简易:宫颈癌筛查经济评估马尔可夫模型的系统评价
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2018 Jul 10;73:e385. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2018/e385.
10
Equal Management of Equal Risks: What Should be Used as the Standard for Cervical Cancer Prevention?同等风险的平等管理:宫颈癌预防应以何为标准?
J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2018 Jul;22(3):237-241. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000402.