Suppr超能文献

超声测量手指屈肌腱厚度时换能器位置的价值

Value of transducer positions in the measurement of finger flexor tendon thickness by sonography.

作者信息

Klauser Andrea, Stadlbauer Karl-Heinz, Frauscher Ferdinand, Herold Manfred, Klima Guenther, Schirmer Michael, zur Nedden Dieter

机构信息

Department of Radiology II, University Hospital Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.

出版信息

J Ultrasound Med. 2004 Mar;23(3):331-7. doi: 10.7863/jum.2004.23.3.331.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the value of 2 transducer positions for measurement of finger flexor tendon thickness by sonography.

METHODS

Flexor tendon thickness of the third finger was measured sonographically by 2 independent investigators in 20 healthy volunteers (n = 40 fingers) and in 4 cadaveric specimens (n = 4 fingers). Flexor tendon thickness was measured at histologic examination in the cadaveric specimens. We defined the area of the A1 annular pulley as position I and the area of the A2 annular pulley as position II. Sonographic measurements were performed in transverse (dorsovolar and radioulnar) and longitudinal planes. Interobserver and intraobserver variabilities were evaluated by each investigator performing 3 measurements at each position.

RESULTS

In position I, volunteers had flexor tendon thickness of 2.7 to 4.0 mm (mean +/- SD, 3.28 +/- 0.26 mm) longitudinally; transversally the thickness was 2.5 to 4.0 mm (mean, 3.34 +/- 0.29 mm) dorsovolar and 5.5 to 8.9 mm (mean, 7.34 +/- 0.71) radioulnar in position I. Position II revealed thickness of 3.2 to 4.2 mm (mean, 3.6 +/- 0.23 mm) longitudinally; transversally the thickness was 2.7 to 4.1 mm (mean, 3.4 +/- 0.27) dorsovolar and 4.3 to 6.8 mm (mean, 5.27 +/- 0.65) radioulnar. Interobserver and intraobserver variability for position I was better than for position II (P < .01 versus P < .05). Sonographic findings correlated excellently with histologic findings (r2 = 0.94).

CONCLUSIONS

Standardized transducer positions for sonographic measurements of finger flexor tendon thickness showed good interobserver and intraobserver variability. Position I was found to be more reliable than position II.

摘要

目的

评估两种超声探头位置在测量手指屈肌腱厚度方面的价值。

方法

两名独立研究者对20名健康志愿者(共40根手指)和4具尸体标本(共4根手指)的第三指屈肌腱厚度进行超声测量。对尸体标本进行组织学检查时测量屈肌腱厚度。我们将A1环形滑车区域定义为位置I,A2环形滑车区域定义为位置II。在横切平面(掌背侧和桡尺侧)和纵切平面进行超声测量。每位研究者在每个位置进行3次测量,以此评估观察者间和观察者内的变异性。

结果

在位置I,志愿者纵切时屈肌腱厚度为2.7至4.0毫米(平均值±标准差,3.28±0.26毫米);横切时,掌背侧厚度为2.5至4.0毫米(平均值,3.34±0.29毫米),桡尺侧厚度为5.5至8.9毫米(平均值,7.34±0.71毫米)。位置II纵切时厚度为3.2至4.2毫米(平均值,3.6±0.23毫米);横切时,掌背侧厚度为2.7至4.1毫米(平均值,3.4±0.27毫米),桡尺侧厚度为4.3至6.8毫米(平均值,5.27±0.65毫米)。位置I的观察者间和观察者内变异性优于位置II(P < 0.01对比P < 0.05)。超声检查结果与组织学检查结果高度相关(r2 = 0.94)。

结论

用于手指屈肌腱厚度超声测量的标准化探头位置显示出良好的观察者间和观察者内变异性。发现位置I比位置II更可靠。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验