Schlosser Ralf W
Department of Speech-language Pathology and Audiology, Northeastern University, 151B Forsyth, 360 Huntington Ave., Boston, MA 02115, USA.
J Commun Disord. 2004 May-Jun;37(3):217-39. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2003.09.003.
Evaluation of client progress is an important topic in communicative disorders research and clinical literature. Goal attainment scaling (GAS) is a technique for evaluating individual progress toward goals. Despite recognition of GAS as a clinical-outcome assessment technique in other clinical professions, the current debate on measuring client progress and outcome measurement in communication disorders has largely ignored GAS. The purpose of this paper is threefold: (a) to introduce GAS to the field of communication disorders, (b) to offer a critical review, and (c) to explore directions for harnessing the value of GAS for the field. In addition to the ability of GAS to evaluate individualized longitudinal change, it offers the following positive attributes: (a) grading of goal attainment, (b) comparability across goals and clients through aggregation, (c) adaptability to any International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health levels and domains, (d) versatility across populations and interventions, (e) linkage tied to expected outcomes, (f) facilitator of goal attainment, and (g) a focal point for team energies. The unique value of GAS could render this technique as a welcomed addition to the present set of options available to clinicians interested in assessing progress and evaluating change. Reliability and validity of GAS will be discussed. Finally, directions for harnessing the potential of GAS for communication disorders are offered for clinical practice and clinical-outcome research.
(1) As a result of this activity, the participant will be able to delineate the steps involved in GAS. (2) As a result of this activity, the participant will be able to describe the positive attributes of GAS as a method for assessing client progress. (3) As a result of this activity, the participant will be able to identify issues that enhance the reliability and validity of GAS.
评估服务对象的进展是言语-语言障碍研究和临床文献中的一个重要课题。目标达成量表(GAS)是一种评估个体朝着目标进展情况的技术。尽管在其他临床专业领域中,GAS被公认为一种临床结果评估技术,但目前关于言语-语言障碍中服务对象进展测量和结果测量的争论在很大程度上忽略了GAS。本文的目的有三个:(a)向言语-语言障碍领域介绍GAS,(b)进行批判性综述,(c)探索发挥GAS对该领域价值的方向。除了能够评估个体化的纵向变化外,GAS还具有以下积极特性:(a)目标达成的分级,(b)通过汇总实现目标间和服务对象间的可比性,(c)对任何《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》水平和领域的适应性,(d)在不同人群和干预措施中的通用性,(e)与预期结果的关联,(f)目标达成的促进因素,以及(g)团队精力的聚焦点。GAS的独特价值可能使其成为对评估进展和评估变化感兴趣的临床医生现有选项中的一个受欢迎的补充。将讨论GAS的信度和效度。最后,为临床实践和临床结果研究提供了发挥GAS在言语-语言障碍方面潜力的方向。
(1)通过本活动,参与者将能够描述GAS所涉及的步骤。(2)通过本活动,参与者将能够描述GAS作为评估服务对象进展方法的积极特性。(3)通过本活动,参与者将能够识别提高GAS信度和效度的问题。