Suppr超能文献

人隐静脉内皮细胞(HSVEC)和人脐静脉内皮细胞(HUVEC)之间的表型和功能差异。

Phenotypic and functional differences between human saphenous vein (HSVEC) and umbilical vein (HUVEC) endothelial cells.

作者信息

Tan P H, Chan C, Xue S A, Dong R, Ananthesayanan B, Manunta M, Kerouedan C, Cheshire N J W, Wolfe J H, Haskard D O, Taylor K M, George A J T

机构信息

Department of Immunology, Division of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London W12 ONN, UK.

出版信息

Atherosclerosis. 2004 Apr;173(2):171-83. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2003.12.011.

Abstract

The vascular endothelial cell (EC) plays an essential role in the pathogenesis of inflammation, transplant rejection and tumour metastasis. Most research on vascular ECs uses human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs). However, HUVECs are derived from immune-naive foetal tissue, and show significant functional differences from adult vascular endothelium. In this paper, we characterise an alternative model based on human saphenous vein ECs (HSVECs), describe their culture conditions and provide a detailed functional comparison with HUVECs. Compared with HUVECs, HSVECs show an increased sensitivity to ox-LDL and a reduced response to cytokines, as indicated by adhesion molecule expression as well as leukocyte adhesion and transmigration. With respect to their ability to present antigen, HSVECs have a higher level of HLA-DR, CD40 and ICOS-L following cytokine stimulation. In addition, HSVECs upregulate the costimulatory ligand CD80 (B7.1) following CD40 ligation, and support allogeneic T cell proliferation, while HUVECs fail to express CD80. Due to differential expression of adhesion molecules, poorly differentiated tumour cell lines also showed more adhesion to HSVECs than to HUVECs. These results indicate that HSVECs have advantages over HUVECs for studying adult vascular endothelial pathology in vitro.

摘要

血管内皮细胞(EC)在炎症、移植排斥和肿瘤转移的发病机制中起着至关重要的作用。大多数关于血管内皮细胞的研究使用人脐静脉内皮细胞(HUVECs)。然而,HUVECs来源于免疫未成熟的胎儿组织,与成人血管内皮在功能上存在显著差异。在本文中,我们对基于人隐静脉内皮细胞(HSVECs)的替代模型进行了表征,描述了其培养条件,并与HUVECs进行了详细的功能比较。与HUVECs相比,HSVECs对氧化型低密度脂蛋白(ox-LDL)的敏感性增加,对细胞因子的反应降低,这通过黏附分子表达以及白细胞黏附和迁移得以体现。就其呈递抗原的能力而言,细胞因子刺激后,HSVECs的人类白细胞抗原-DR(HLA-DR)、CD40和诱导共刺激分子配体(ICOS-L)水平更高。此外,CD40连接后,HSVECs上调共刺激配体CD80(B7.1),并支持同种异体T细胞增殖,而HUVECs不表达CD80。由于黏附分子的差异表达,低分化肿瘤细胞系对HSVECs的黏附也比对HUVECs更多。这些结果表明,在体外研究成人血管内皮病理方面,HSVECs比HUVECs具有优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验