• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从经验中学习:健康研究中的隐私与数据二次利用

Learning from experience: privacy and the secondary use of data in health research.

作者信息

Lowrance William W

机构信息

Judge Institute of Management, University of Cambridge, UK.

出版信息

J Biolaw Bus. 2003;6(4):30-60.

PMID:15072055
Abstract

In this fast-moving age of data banking, data are a currency, and often a commodity. Electronic health records are being developed everywhere. Increasingly, data collected for various primary purposes are being re-used for research. With personal mobility, contracting of services, and telemedicine, health care data are crossing national borders, and therefore so are genetic information, biological materials, and reimbursement data. There is much public and legal concern about the implications. This article addresses the question: Under what conditions may data not collected specifically for research, such as primary medical data, be re-used for health research without compromising the privacy of the data-subjects?

摘要

在这个数据存储快速发展的时代,数据是一种货币,而且往往是一种商品。电子健康记录正在各地得到开发。越来越多为各种主要目的收集的数据正被重新用于研究。随着个人流动性、服务承包和远程医疗的发展,医疗保健数据正跨越国界,因此基因信息、生物材料和报销数据也是如此。公众和法律对其影响非常关注。本文探讨的问题是:在不损害数据主体隐私的情况下,诸如基本医疗数据等并非专门为研究而收集的数据,在何种条件下可以被重新用于健康研究?

相似文献

1
Learning from experience: privacy and the secondary use of data in health research.从经验中学习:健康研究中的隐私与数据二次利用
J Biolaw Bus. 2003;6(4):30-60.
2
Medical records. Enhancing privacy, preserving the common good.医疗记录。增强隐私保护,维护公共利益。
Hastings Cent Rep. 1999 Mar-Apr;29(2):14-23.
3
Perspectives of Australian adults about protecting the privacy of their health information in statistical databases.澳大利亚成年人对保护其健康信息在统计数据库中隐私的看法。
Int J Med Inform. 2012 Apr;81(4):279-89. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.01.005. Epub 2012 Feb 10.
4
Family privacy and death--Antigone, war, and medical research.家庭隐私与死亡——安提戈涅、战争与医学研究
N Engl J Med. 2005 Feb 3;352(5):501-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJMlim042648.
5
Medical privacy and research.医疗隐私与研究
J Legal Stud. 2001 Jun;30(2):687-701. doi: 10.1086/342031.
6
The use and disclosure of protected health information for research under the HIPAA privacy rule: unrealized patient autonomy and burdensome government regulation.根据《健康保险流通与责任法案》(HIPAA)隐私规则,受保护健康信息在研究中的使用与披露:未实现的患者自主权与繁重的政府监管。
S D Law Rev. 2004;49(3):447-502.
7
Privacy and confidentiality practices for research with health information in Canada.加拿大健康信息研究中的隐私与保密措施。
J Law Med Ethics. 1997 Summer-Fall;25(2-3):130-8, 82. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.1997.tb01888.x.
8
What should IRBs consider when applying the privacy rule to research?当将隐私规则应用于研究时,机构审查委员会应考虑哪些因素?
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2002 Sep;12(3):299-303. doi: 10.1353/ken.2002.0017.
9
Privacy architecture and e-consent. What the future holds.隐私架构与电子同意书。未来会怎样。
J AHIMA. 2007 Jun;78(6):64-5, 70.
10
Using personal health information in medical research.在医学研究中使用个人健康信息。
BMJ. 2006 Jan 21;332(7534):130-1. doi: 10.1136/bmj.332.7534.130.

引用本文的文献

1
The anatomy of electronic patient record ethics: a framework to guide design, development, implementation, and use.电子病历伦理剖析:指导设计、开发、实施及使用的框架
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Feb 4;22(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00574-x.
2
Examination and diagnosis of electronic patient records and their associated ethics: a scoping literature review.电子病历的检查与诊断及其相关伦理:一项范围界定文献综述
BMC Med Ethics. 2020 Aug 24;21(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12910-020-00514-1.
3
President's Statement.总统声明。
Yearb Med Inform. 2017 Aug;26(1):1-2. doi: 10.15265/IY-2016-028. Epub 2017 Sep 11.
4
Informed consent and registry-based research - the case of the Danish circumcision registry.知情同意与基于登记处的研究——以丹麦包皮环切登记处为例。
BMC Med Ethics. 2017 Sep 15;18(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s12910-017-0212-y.
5
Criminal Prohibition of Wrongful Re‑identification: Legal Solution or Minefield for Big Data?对不当重新识别的刑事禁止:法律解决方案还是大数据的雷区?
J Bioeth Inq. 2017 Dec;14(4):527-539. doi: 10.1007/s11673-017-9806-9. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
6
The promotion of data sharing in pharmacoepidemiology.药物流行病学中数据共享的推广。
Eur J Health Law. 2014 Jun;21(3):271-96. doi: 10.1163/15718093-12341323.
7
Consent for the use of personal medical data in research.同意在研究中使用个人医疗数据。
BMJ. 2006 Jul 29;333(7561):255-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.333.7561.255.
8
Patient privacy and confidentiality.患者隐私与保密。
BMJ. 2003 Apr 5;326(7392):725-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7392.725.