Najib Naji, Idkaidek Nasir, Beshtawi M, Bader Mohammed, Admour Isra', Alam S Mahmood, Zaman Q, Dham Ruwayda
International Pharmaceutical Research Centre (IPRC), Amman-Jordan.
Biopharm Drug Dispos. 2004 Apr;25(3):103-8. doi: 10.1002/bdd.388.
A randomized, two-way, crossover, bioequivalence study in 24 fasting, healthy, male volunteers was conducted to compare two brands of aceclofenac 100 mg tablets, Aceclofar (Julphar, UAE) as test and Bristaflam (Bristol Myers Squibb, Egypt) as the reference product. The drug was administered with 240 ml of water after a 10 h overnight fast on two treatment days separated by 1 week washout period. After dosing, serial blood samples were collected for a period of 24 h. Plasma harvested from blood was analysed for aceclofenac by a validated HPLC method with UV-visible detection capable of detecting aceclofenac in the range 0.2-8.0 microg/ml with the limit of quantitation as 0.2 microg/ml. Various pharmacokinetic parameters including AUC(0-t), AUC(0- infinity ), C(max), T(max), T(1/2), and lambda(Z) were determined from plasma concentrations for both formulations and found to be in good agreement with reported values. AUC(0-t), AUC(0- infinity), and C(max) were tested for bioequivalence after log-transformation of data. No significant difference was found based on ANOVA; 90% confidence interval (100.0%-106.4% for AUC(0-t), 100.2%-106.8% for AUC(0- infinity ); 83.3%-102.8% for C(max)) of test/reference ratio for these parameters were found to be within the bioequivalence acceptance range of 80%-125%. Based on these statistical inferences, it was concluded that Aceclofar is bioequivalent to Bristaflam.
在24名空腹、健康的男性志愿者中进行了一项随机、双向、交叉生物等效性研究,以比较两种品牌的100毫克醋氯芬酸片,即作为试验制剂的Aceclofar(阿联酋Julphar公司生产)和作为参比制剂的Bristaflam(埃及百时美施贵宝公司生产)。在经过10小时过夜禁食后,于两个治疗日服用药物,两个治疗日之间间隔1周的洗脱期,药物用240毫升水送服。给药后,采集连续24小时的血样。通过一种经过验证的高效液相色谱法(HPLC)对从血液中采集的血浆进行醋氯芬酸分析,该方法采用紫外-可见检测,能够检测浓度范围为0.2 - 8.0微克/毫升的醋氯芬酸,定量限为0.2微克/毫升。从两种制剂的血浆浓度中确定了包括AUC(0-t)、AUC(0-∞)、C(max)、T(max)、T(1/2)和λ(Z)在内的各种药代动力学参数,发现这些参数与报告值吻合良好。对数据进行对数转换后,对AUC(0-t)、AUC(0-∞)和C(max)进行生物等效性检验。基于方差分析未发现显著差异;这些参数的试验/参比比值的90%置信区间(AUC(0-t)为100.0% - 106.4%,AUC(0-∞)为100.2% - 106.8%;C(max)为83.3% - 102.8%)在生物等效性可接受范围80% - 125%内。基于这些统计推断,得出结论:Aceclofar与Bristaflam具有生物等效性。