Krupa S V, Manning W J
Department of Plant Pathology, University of Minnesota, St Paul, MN 55108, USA.
Environ Pollut. 1988;50(1-2):101-37. doi: 10.1016/0269-7491(88)90187-x.
Ozone (O(3)) is present both in the troposphere and the stratosphere. Troposphere O(3) is predominantly produced by photochemical reactions involving precursors generated by natural processes and to a much larger extent by man's activities. There is evidence for a trend towards increasing tropospheric O(3) concentrations. However, tropospheric O(3) is known to account for only 10% of the vertical O(3) column above the earth's surface. The stratosphere accounts for an additional 90% of the O(3) column. There is evidence to suggest that there are losses in the stratospheric O(3) due to the updraft of O(3) destroying pollutants generated by both natural processes and by human activity. Such a loss in stratospheric O(3) can result in alterations of incidence in the ultraviolet (UV) radiation to the earth's surface. Tropospheric O(3) is known to be highly phytotoxic. Appropriate exposures to O(3) can result in both acute (symptomatic) and chronic (changes in growth, yield or productivity and quality) effects. Chronic effects are of great concern in terms of both crops and forests. A number of experimental techniques are available to evaluate the chronic effects of O(3) on plants. There are limitations attached to the use of these techniques. However, results obtained, with such techniques are valuable if interpreted in the appropriate context. Among all field evaluation techniques, open-top chambers are the most frequently used method for evaluating the chronic effects of O(3) on crops. The National Crop Loss Assessment Program (NCLAN) of the United States is the largest such effort. However, given the limitations of the open-top chambers and the experimental aspects of NCLAN, its results must be interpreted with caution. On the other hand, acute effects can be evaluated with less complexity through the use of biological indicator plants. The numerical modelling of such effects are also far less complicated than establishing numerical cause and effects relationships for chronic effects. Confounding the acute or chronic responses of plants to O(3), is the presence of other kinds and forms of pollutants in the ambient atmosphere and the incidence of pathogens and pests. The resulting complex interactions and joint effects on plants are poorly understood. Future research must address these issues. In the final analysis we have re-emphasized the fact that plant health is the product of its interaction with the physical and chemical climatology and pathogens and pests. What we have described in this context is the importance of tropospheric O(3) within the chemical climatology of our environment and its effects on vegetation.
臭氧(O₃)同时存在于对流层和平流层。对流层中的臭氧主要由涉及自然过程产生的前体物质的光化学反应产生,在很大程度上也由人类活动产生。有证据表明对流层臭氧浓度呈上升趋势。然而,已知对流层臭氧仅占地球表面上方垂直臭氧柱的10%。平流层则占臭氧柱的另外90%。有证据表明,由于自然过程和人类活动产生的破坏臭氧的污染物的上升气流,平流层中的臭氧有所损失。平流层臭氧的这种损失会导致地球表面紫外线(UV)辐射发生率的改变。已知对流层臭氧具有高度的植物毒性。适当暴露于臭氧会导致急性(有症状)和慢性(生长、产量或生产力及质量的变化)影响。就作物和森林而言,慢性影响备受关注。有多种实验技术可用于评估臭氧对植物的慢性影响。使用这些技术存在局限性。然而,如果在适当的背景下进行解释,用这些技术获得的结果是有价值的。在所有田间评估技术中,开顶式气室是评估臭氧对作物慢性影响最常用的方法。美国的国家作物损失评估计划(NCLAN)是规模最大的此类项目。然而,鉴于开顶式气室的局限性以及NCLAN的实验方面的问题,其结果必须谨慎解释。另一方面,通过使用生物指示植物可以以较低的复杂性评估急性影响。此类影响的数值模拟也远不如建立慢性影响的数值因果关系复杂。困扰植物对臭氧的急性或慢性反应的是环境大气中其他种类和形式的污染物的存在以及病原体和害虫的发生率。由此产生的对植物的复杂相互作用和联合影响还知之甚少。未来的研究必须解决这些问题。归根结底,我们再次强调了这样一个事实,即植物健康是其与物理和化学气候以及病原体和害虫相互作用的产物。我们在此背景下所描述的是对流层臭氧在我们环境的化学气候中的重要性及其对植被的影响。