Eckstein Felix, Kuhn Volker, Lochmüller Eva-Maria
Musculoskeletal Research Group, Institute of Anatomy, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Pettenkoferstr. 11, 80336 München, Germany.
Ann Biomed Eng. 2004 Mar;32(3):487-503. doi: 10.1023/b:abme.0000017543.20342.07.
Osteoporotic fractures represent an important medical problem as they are often early predictors of future fractures at other skeletal sites. The distal radius is one such fracture site. To determine the individual's risk of fracture, different measurement techniques have been developed. These methods differ in physical background, measurement site, output parameters, and cost. If correctly applied, biomechanical testing can be an efficient tool for the preclinical evaluation of these techniques. With biomechanical testing it is possible to determine the structural strength of bone which can then be correlated with various densitometric parameters. Here we will review experimental work performed in this context. Biomechanical testing conditions vary considerably from study to study with 3-point bending (shaft), axial compression (metaphysis), and fall simulations being some of the techniques used. Experimental evidence suggests that site-specific osteodensitometric measurements can predict the mechanical strength of the distal radius with moderate to high accuracy, but that measurements at remote sites display considerably lower predictive value. Geometry-based parameters of cortical bone are also good predictors, but have not been shown to offer significant advantage over measurement of bone mass. Some (but not all) studies have found that quantitative ultrasound and microstructural parameters contribute significant additional information to bone mass measurement. The most accurate prediction of distal radius fractures, however, appears to be (patient-specific) microstructural finite element modeling.
骨质疏松性骨折是一个重要的医学问题,因为它们往往是未来其他骨骼部位骨折的早期预测指标。桡骨远端就是这样一个骨折部位。为了确定个体的骨折风险,已经开发了不同的测量技术。这些方法在物理背景、测量部位、输出参数和成本方面存在差异。如果应用得当,生物力学测试可以成为对这些技术进行临床前评估的有效工具。通过生物力学测试,可以确定骨骼的结构强度,然后将其与各种骨密度参数相关联。在此,我们将回顾在这方面所进行的实验工作。生物力学测试条件在不同研究中差异很大,使用的技术包括三点弯曲(骨干)、轴向压缩(干骺端)和跌落模拟等。实验证据表明,特定部位的骨密度测量可以以中等到高精度预测桡骨远端的机械强度,但在较远部位的测量显示出较低的预测价值。基于几何形状的皮质骨参数也是很好的预测指标,但尚未显示出比骨量测量具有显著优势。一些(但不是所有)研究发现,定量超声和微观结构参数为骨量测量提供了重要的额外信息。然而,对桡骨远端骨折最准确的预测似乎是(针对患者的)微观结构有限元建模。