Gotthardt Martin, Battmann Anke, Höffken Helmut, Schurrat Tino, Pollum Halina, Beuter Daniela, Gratz Stefan, Béhé Martin, Bauhofer Artur, Klose Klaus J, Behr Thomas M
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Philipps-University of Marburg, Baldingerstrasse, 35043 Marburg, Germany.
Nucl Med Commun. 2004 May;25(5):439-43. doi: 10.1097/00006231-200405000-00003.
To determine the clinical potential of 2-[F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (F-FDG PET) in patients with medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC), we compared it to computed tomography (CT), and somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS).
Blinded evaluation of PET, CT and SRS images obtained from 26 patients with histologically proven metastatic MTC was done by nuclear medicine and radiology specialists. Sites of tumour involvement were classified as "sure" or "suspicious". The data were analysed in comparison to two different standards. Either those sites classified as "sure" by at least one of the methods were defined as the standard or those sites of involvement which were classified as "sure" by at least two methods.
Dependent on the type of data analysis performed, PET was able to demonstrate 56.8%/80.6% of the tumour sites, CT showed 64.5%/79.6%, and SRS showed 47.5%/69.9% of the tumour sites.
Overall, CT is similar or better than PET in our patients (dependent on the standard) while SRS is inferior to both other techniques. Our data are in agreement with publications that consider CT superior to PET in the diagnosis of metastatic MTC while other studies show superiority of PET. However, a combination of CT and PET seems to be the most appropriate non-invasive diagnostic approach in patients with MTC.
为了确定2-[F]氟-2-脱氧-D-葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描(F-FDG PET)在甲状腺髓样癌(MTC)患者中的临床应用潜力,我们将其与计算机断层扫描(CT)和生长抑素受体闪烁显像(SRS)进行了比较。
由核医学和放射科专家对26例经组织学证实为转移性MTC患者的PET、CT和SRS图像进行盲法评估。肿瘤累及部位分为“确定”或“可疑”。数据与两种不同标准进行比较分析。要么将至少一种方法分类为“确定”的部位定义为标准,要么将至少两种方法分类为“确定”的累及部位定义为标准。
根据所进行的数据分析类型,PET能够显示56.8%/80.6%的肿瘤部位,CT显示64.5%/79.6%,SRS显示47.5%/69.9%的肿瘤部位。
总体而言,在我们的患者中,CT与PET相似或优于PET(取决于标准),而SRS不如其他两种技术。我们的数据与认为CT在转移性MTC诊断中优于PET的出版物一致,而其他研究显示PET具有优越性。然而,CT和PET联合似乎是MTC患者最合适的非侵入性诊断方法。