Regulatory policy. White House softens disputed peer-review plan.
作者信息
Kaiser Jocelyn
出版信息
Science. 2004 Apr 23;304(5670):496-7. doi: 10.1126/science.304.5670.496a.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Regulatory policy. White House softens disputed peer-review plan.
Science. 2004 Apr 23;304(5670):496-7. doi: 10.1126/science.304.5670.496a.
2
Science and regulation. A White House mandate for more peer review.
Science. 2003 Sep 5;301(5638):1307. doi: 10.1126/science.301.5638.1307b.
3
Disclosure and disinterest.
Science. 2004 Jan 2;303(5654):15. doi: 10.1126/science.303.5654.15.
4
Science and government. Disclosure in regulatory science.
Science. 2003 Dec 19;302(5653):2073. doi: 10.1126/science.1093718.
5
Peer review and federal regulations.
N Engl J Med. 2004 Jan 8;350(2):103-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp038230.
6
U.S. science policy. Risky business.
Science. 2004 Oct 8;306(5694):220-1. doi: 10.1126/science.306.5694.220.
7
Grants management. NSF survey of applicants finds a system teetering on the brink.
Science. 2007 Aug 17;317(5840):880-1. doi: 10.1126/science.317.5840.880.
8
Praise, for a change.
Science. 2004 May 21;304(5674):1077. doi: 10.1126/science.304.5674.1077.
9
Naturally occurring asbestos: a recurring public policy challenge.
J Hazard Mater. 2008 May 1;153(1-2):1-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.11.079. Epub 2007 Nov 28.
10
Science policy. Priorities needed for nano-risk research and development.
Science. 2006 Oct 6;314(5796):45. doi: 10.1126/science.314.5796.45.
Zotero 插件