New K, Flenady V, Davies M W
Grantley Stable Neonatal Unit, Royal Women's Hospital, Butterfield Street, Herston, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, 4029.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(2):CD004214. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004214.pub2.
The use of incubators in helping to maintain a thermoneutral environment for preterm infants has become routine practice in neonatal nurseries. As one of the key criteria for discharging preterm infants from nurseries is their ability to maintain temperature, the infant will need to make the transition from incubator to open cot at some time before discharge. The timing of this transition is important because when an infant is challenged by cold, the infant attempts to increase its heat production to maintain body temperature. The increase in energy expenditure may affect weight gain. The practice of transferring infants from incubators to open cots usually occurs once a weight of around 1700-1800 g has been reached; however, this practice varies widely between neonatal units. This preferred weight mark appears to be largely based on tradition or the personal experience of clinicians, with little consideration of the infant's weight or gestational age at birth.
The main objective was to assess the effects on weight gain and temperature control of a policy of transferring preterm infants from incubator to open cot at lower versus higher body weight.
Searches were undertaken of MEDLINE from June 2003 back to 1966, CINAHL from June 2003 back to 1987 and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2003). The title and abstract of each retrieved study were examined to assess eligibility. If there was uncertainty, the full paper was examined.
Trials in which preterm infants were randomly allocated to a policy of transfer from incubators to open cots at a lower body weight versus at a higher body weight.
Quality assessments and data extraction for included trials were conducted independently by the reviewers. Data for individual trial results were analysed using relative risk (RR) and mean difference (MD). Results are presented with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Due to insufficient data, meta-analysis could not be undertaken.
Four studies were identified as potentially eligible for inclusion in this review. Two studies were excluded as random allocation to the exposure was not employed. One study is pending, awaiting additional information from the authors. Therefore, one study involving 60 preterm infants, employing a matched-pairs design, which compared the transfer of infants to open cots at 1700 g versus 1800 g, is included in this review. Only two outcomes could be included from this study; return to incubator and daily weight gain. No statistically significant difference was shown for either return to incubator (RR 2.00, 95% CI 0.40 to 10.11) or daily weight gain [MD 4.00 g/day (95% CI -5.23, 13.23)]. Due to small numbers, effects on clinically important outcomes could not be adequately assessed.
REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS: There is currently little evidence from randomised trials to inform practice on the preferred weight for transferring preterm infants from incubators to open cots. There is a need for larger randomised controlled trials to address this deficiency.
在新生儿重症监护室中,使用暖箱为早产儿维持中性温度环境已成为常规做法。由于早产儿从重症监护室出院的关键标准之一是其维持体温的能力,因此婴儿在出院前的某个时间需要从暖箱过渡到开放式婴儿床。这种过渡的时机很重要,因为当婴儿受到寒冷挑战时,会试图增加产热以维持体温。能量消耗的增加可能会影响体重增加。将婴儿从暖箱转移到开放式婴儿床的做法通常在体重达到约1700 - 1800克时进行;然而,这种做法在不同的新生儿病房差异很大。这个首选的体重标准似乎很大程度上基于传统或临床医生的个人经验,很少考虑婴儿出生时的体重或胎龄。
主要目的是评估将早产儿在较低体重与较高体重时从暖箱转移到开放式婴儿床的策略对体重增加和体温控制的影响。
检索了MEDLINE(从2003年6月回溯至1966年)、CINAHL(从2003年6月回溯至1987年)以及Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library, 2003年第1期)。检查每个检索到的研究的标题和摘要以评估其是否符合纳入标准。如有不确定性,则检查全文。
将早产儿随机分配到在较低体重或较高体重时从暖箱转移到开放式婴儿床策略的试验。
纳入试验的质量评估和数据提取由评审人员独立进行。使用相对风险(RR)和平均差(MD)分析各个试验结果的数据。结果以95%置信区间(CI)呈现。由于数据不足,无法进行荟萃分析。
确定了四项研究可能符合本综述的纳入标准。两项研究因未采用随机分配暴露因素而被排除。一项研究正在等待结果,有待作者提供更多信息。因此,本综述纳入了一项涉及60名早产儿的研究,该研究采用配对设计,比较了婴儿在1700克与1800克时转移到开放式婴儿床的情况。该研究仅能纳入两个结果;返回暖箱和每日体重增加。返回暖箱(RR 2.00,95% CI 0.40至10.11)或每日体重增加[MD 4.00克/天(95% CI -5.23,13.23)]均未显示出统计学上的显著差异。由于样本量小,对临床重要结局的影响无法得到充分评估。
目前几乎没有随机试验的证据可为早产儿从暖箱转移到开放式婴儿床的首选体重的实践提供参考。需要进行更大规模的随机对照试验来弥补这一不足。