Suppr超能文献

脑低温的维持是否是逆行脑灌注比低温循环停止提供更好脑保护的主要机制?一项在猪模型中的研究。

Is maintenance of cerebral hypothermia the principal mechanism by which retrograde cerebral perfusion provides better brain protection than hypothermic circulatory arrest? A study in a porcine model.

作者信息

Li Zhijun, Yang Luojia, Summers Randy, Jackson Michael, Deslauriers Roxanne, Ye Jian

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Manitoba.

出版信息

J Card Surg. 2004 Jan-Feb;19(1):28-35. doi: 10.1111/j.0886-0440.2004.04006.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Retrograde cerebral perfusion (RCP) provides better brain protection than hypothermic circulatory arrest (HCA) alone. The mechanism by which RCP improves brain protection during circulatory arrest remains unknown. The purpose of the study in pigs was to determine if RCP improves brain protection mainly as a result of its ability to maintain cerebral hypothermia.

METHODS

Fifteen pigs were subjected to 120 minutes of HCA alone (HCA group, n = 5), HCA + RCP at perfusion pressures of 23 to 29 mmHg (RCP-low group, n = 5), or at perfusion pressures of 34-40 mmHg (RCP-high group, n = 5) at 15 degrees C, followed by 60 minutes of normothermic cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). After brain temperature reached 15 degrees C, HCA was initiated with or without RCP. Temperatures in the brain, esophagus, and perfusate/blood were monitored continuously. Brain tissue blood flow was measured continuously using a laser flowmeter. Brain oxygen extraction was calculated from the oxygen contents in arterial and venous blood samples.

RESULTS

During cooling and rewarming, the change in temperature was slower in the brain than in the esophagus. A similar degree of spontaneous rewarming (from 15 degrees C to 17/18 degrees C) occurred in the brain during HCA and RCP. This indicates that RCP does not provide better maintenance of cerebral hypothermia during circulatory arrest than HCA alone. The esophageal temperature rose more slowly during RCP than during HCA alone, indicating that RCP maintains better hypothermia in the body. During RCP, the brain extracted oxygen continuously from the blood, indicating that RCP may provide nutrient flow to the brain.

CONCLUSION

In an acute pig model, maintenance of cerebral hypothermia does not appear to be the principal mechanism by which RCP provides better brain protection than HCA alone. Retrograde cerebral perfusion provides nutrient flow/oxygen to brain tissue, leading to better brain protection than HCA alone.

摘要

目的

逆行脑灌注(RCP)比单纯低温循环停搏(HCA)能提供更好的脑保护。RCP在循环停搏期间改善脑保护的机制尚不清楚。本研究在猪身上进行,目的是确定RCP改善脑保护主要是否由于其维持脑低温的能力。

方法

15头猪在15℃下单独接受120分钟的HCA(HCA组,n = 5)、灌注压力为23至29 mmHg的HCA + RCP(低RCP组,n = 5)或灌注压力为34 - 40 mmHg的HCA + RCP(高RCP组,n = 5),随后进行60分钟的常温体外循环(CPB)。脑温达到15℃后,开始进行有或无RCP的HCA。连续监测脑、食管以及灌注液/血液的温度。使用激光流量计连续测量脑组织血流量。根据动脉和静脉血样本中的氧含量计算脑氧摄取率。

结果

在降温及复温过程中,脑温变化比食管温变化慢。在HCA和RCP期间,脑内出现了相似程度的自发复温(从15℃至17/18℃)。这表明RCP在循环停搏期间并不比单纯HCA能更好地维持脑低温。RCP期间食管温度上升比单纯HCA期间更慢,表明RCP能更好地维持身体低温。在RCP期间,脑持续从血液中摄取氧,表明RCP可能为脑提供营养物质流动。

结论

在急性猪模型中,维持脑低温似乎不是RCP比单纯HCA提供更好脑保护作用的主要机制。逆行脑灌注为脑组织提供营养物质流动/氧,从而比单纯HCA能提供更好的脑保护。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验