Agrawal Shrutidevi, Singh Inderjit, Kaur Kanwal Jit, Bhade Shantaram R, Kaul Chaman Lal, Panchagnula Ramesh
Department of Pharmaceutics, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER), Sector 67, S.A.S. Nagar 160062, Punjab, India.
Int J Pharm. 2004 May 19;276(1-2):41-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2004.02.019.
Fixed dose combination (FDC) formulations became popular in the treatment of tuberculosis (TB) because of the better patient compliance, reduced risk of monotherapy and emergence of drug resistance in contrast to treatment with separate formulations of two to four first-line drugs. However, its successful implementation in national programs is limited by probable bioinequivalency of rifampicin if present in FDC form. In this regard, World Health Organization (WHO) and International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease (IUATLD) recommend FDCs only of proven bioavailability. Hence, bioequivalence study of four drug FDC tablet was conducted using 22 healthy male volunteers according to WHO recommended protocol to determine bioavailability of rifampicin, isoniazid and pyrazinamide compared to standard separate combination at the same dose level. The study was designed as two period, two treatment crossover experiment with a washout period of 1 week. Bioequivalence of rifampicin was estimated by plasma and urinary method for both rifampicin and its active metabolite, des-acetyl rifampicin whereas isoniazid and pyrazinamide were estimated from plasma. Mean concentration time profiles and all the pharmacokinetic parameters of rifampicin, isoniazid and pyrazinamide from FDC tablet were comparable to individual formulations and passed the bioequivalence test with power of the test above 95%. Further, bioequivalence of both rifampicin and isoniazid shows that in vitro interaction of rifampicin and isoniazid is clinically insignificant. Thus, it was concluded that FDC formulation is bioequivalent for rifampicin, isoniazid and pyrazinamide and ensures the successful treatment of TB without compromising therapeutic efficacy of any of these components of anti-TB therapy.
固定剂量复方制剂(FDC)在结核病(TB)治疗中很受欢迎,因为与使用两到四种一线药物的单独制剂治疗相比,患者依从性更好,单药治疗风险降低且耐药性出现的可能性降低。然而,如果以FDC形式存在,利福平可能存在生物不等效性,这限制了其在国家项目中的成功实施。在这方面,世界卫生组织(WHO)和国际防痨和肺部疾病联盟(IUATLD)仅推荐具有已证实生物利用度的FDC。因此,根据WHO推荐的方案,对22名健康男性志愿者进行了四种药物FDC片剂的生物等效性研究,以确定与相同剂量水平的标准单独组合相比,利福平、异烟肼和吡嗪酰胺的生物利用度。该研究设计为两期、两治疗交叉实验,洗脱期为1周。通过血浆和尿液方法对利福平及其活性代谢物去乙酰利福平进行利福平生物等效性评估,而异烟肼和吡嗪酰胺则通过血浆进行评估。FDC片剂中利福平、异烟肼和吡嗪酰胺的平均浓度-时间曲线和所有药代动力学参数与单个制剂相当,并通过了生物等效性测试,测试效能高于95%。此外,利福平和异烟肼的生物等效性表明,利福平和异烟肼的体外相互作用在临床上无显著意义。因此,得出结论,FDC制剂在利福平、异烟肼和吡嗪酰胺方面具有生物等效性,并确保在不损害抗结核治疗中任何这些成分治疗效果的情况下成功治疗结核病。