Suppr超能文献

后罗曼诺医保:最后一美元优先……第一美元流失?

Post-Romanow pharmacare: last-dollar first...first-dollar lost?

作者信息

Morgan Steven G, Willison Donald J

机构信息

Health Care and Epidemiology, Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

出版信息

Healthc Pap. 2004;4(3):10-20. doi: 10.12927/hcpap..16871.

Abstract

Canada's public-private mix in coverage for pharmaceuticals has long created variation across provinces in access to needed treatments and has contributed to persistent cost growth in both the private and public sectors. Among the recommendations of the 2002 Romanow Commission was a proposed national standard for "last-dollar" pharmacare that would cover any household's drug costs beyond a high annual deductible. Such a program contrasts with the "first-dollar" pharmacare programs currently available for vulnerable populations (e.g., seniors and social assistance recipients) in most provinces. While last-dollar coverage may be a valuable set toward broadening public pharmacare in Canada, there is a risk that provincial governments may interpret the coverage of catastrophic costs as the new pharmacare ideal and therefore reduce or eliminate existing programs that currently offer first-dollar benefits.

摘要

加拿大药品覆盖的公私混合模式长期以来导致各省在获得所需治疗方面存在差异,并促使私营和公共部门的成本持续增长。2002年罗曼诺委员会的建议之一是提出一项“最后一美元”药物治疗的国家标准,该标准将涵盖任何家庭超出高额年度免赔额的药品费用。这样一个项目与目前大多数省份为弱势群体(如老年人和社会援助领取者)提供的“第一美元”药物治疗项目形成对比。虽然最后一美元覆盖范围可能是朝着扩大加拿大公共药物治疗迈出的有价值的一步,但存在一种风险,即省级政府可能将灾难性费用的覆盖范围视为新的药物治疗理想标准,从而减少或取消目前提供第一美元福利的现有项目。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验