Huseby Eric, Kappler John, Marrack Philippa
Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Integrated Department of Immunology, National Jewish Medical and Research Center, Denver, 80206, USA.
Eur J Immunol. 2004 May;34(5):1243-50. doi: 10.1002/eji.200425000.
The purpose of this Commentary is to put into modern-day perspective Jerne's hypothesis that antigen receptors encoded in the genome have been evolutionarily selected for their ability to react with major histocompatibility proteins and that the process of eliminating self reactivity is the catalyst for the generation of diversity of antigen receptors. In writing his hypothesis Jerne was trying to deal with the obsession of the immune system with the MHC, an obsession that was manifest in his days by the strong reactions of the immune system with allogeneic MHC proteins. However, Jerne's hypothesis also took on other issues that were not understood at the time--issues that included lymphocyte selection and tolerance, the generation of somatic diversity and the ability of the MHC to control responses to other antigens. In so doing, Jerne generated a hypothesis that accounted remarkably satisfactorily for what was known in 1971. Whilst the details of much of the hypothesis have since turned out to be incorrect, in his ideas Jerne did anticipate many of the most interesting and surprising findings of the subsequent 33 years.
本述评的目的是从现代视角审视耶尔恩的假说,即基因组中编码的抗原受体因其与主要组织相容性蛋白发生反应的能力而在进化过程中被选择,并且消除自身反应性的过程是抗原受体多样性产生的催化剂。在提出他的假说时,耶尔恩试图解决免疫系统对主要组织相容性复合体(MHC)的痴迷,这种痴迷在他那个时代表现为免疫系统对同种异体MHC蛋白的强烈反应。然而,耶尔恩的假说还涉及当时尚未理解的其他问题,这些问题包括淋巴细胞选择与耐受、体细胞多样性的产生以及MHC控制对其他抗原反应的能力。通过这样做,耶尔恩提出了一个假说,该假说对1971年已知的情况给出了非常令人满意的解释。虽然该假说的许多细节后来被证明是错误的,但在他的观点中,耶尔恩确实预见了随后33年中许多最有趣和最令人惊讶的发现。