Suppr超能文献

三种连续性肾脏替代治疗模式下溶质清除率的比较。

Comparison of solute clearance in three modes of continuous renal replacement therapy.

作者信息

Parakininkas Daiva, Greenbaum Larry A

机构信息

Division of Pediatric Critical Care and Division of Pediatric Nephrology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.

出版信息

Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2004 May;5(3):269-74. doi: 10.1097/01.pcc.0000123554.12555.20.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare the clearances of low molecular weight molecules using three modalities of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) at the low blood flow rates typically used in pediatric patients.

DESIGN

A controlled, in vitro laboratory study.

SETTING

Research laboratory of a health sciences university.

SUBJECTS

AN69 dialysis hemofilter.

INTERVENTIONS

CRRT was performed using a 0.6 m(2) AN69 hemofilter. Human whole blood and plasma were combined to achieve a hematocrit of approximately 30%. Urea and creatinine were added to obtain concentrations of approximately 54 mmol/L of blood urea nitrogen and 1770 micromol/L of creatinine. Clearance data for urea and creatinine at a blood flow rate of 60 mL/min were generated using predilution continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH), postdilution CVVH, and continuous venovenous hemodialysis (CVVHD).

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Clearance of all three modalities was compared at a replacement solution (CVVH) or dialysate (CVVHD) flow rate of 16.7% of the blood flow rate. Both postdilution CVVH and CVVHD had a urea clearance of 11.3 mL/min, which was 15% greater than the 9.8 mL/min urea clearance of predilution CVVH (p <.005). Creatinine clearance with postdilution CVVH (10.7 mL/min) was 15% greater than the 9.0 mL/min clearance produced by predilution CVVH (p < 0.01). Predilution CVVH and CVVHD were compared at a flow rate of either replacement solution (CVVH) or dialysate (CVVHD) of 33% and 50% of the blood flow rate. Postdilution CVVH was not performed at high ultrafiltration rates due to the potential problem of hemoconcentration. CVVHD clearances of urea and creatinine were statistically superior to predilution CVVH at both flow rates.

CONCLUSIONS

CVVHD was superior to predilution CVVH for clearance of urea and creatinine. Postdilution CVVH and CVVHD gave nearly equivalent clearances. At the low blood flow rates used in pediatric patients, which raise concerns about high ultrafiltration during postdilution CVVH causing excessive hemoconcentration and filter clotting, CVVHD appears to be the optimal modality for maximizing clearance of small solutes during CRRT.

摘要

目的

在儿科患者常用的低血流速率下,比较三种连续性肾脏替代治疗(CRRT)方式对低分子量分子的清除率。

设计

一项对照体外实验室研究。

地点

一所健康科学大学的研究实验室。

研究对象

AN69透析血液滤过器。

干预措施

使用0.6平方米的AN69血液滤过器进行CRRT。将人类全血和血浆混合,使血细胞比容达到约30%。添加尿素和肌酐,使血尿素氮浓度约为54 mmol/L,肌酐浓度约为1770 μmol/L。在血流速率为60 mL/min时,使用前稀释连续性静脉-静脉血液滤过(CVVH)、后稀释CVVH和连续性静脉-静脉血液透析(CVVHD)生成尿素和肌酐的清除率数据。

测量指标及主要结果

在置换液(CVVH)或透析液(CVVHD)流速为血流速率的16.7%时,比较三种方式的清除率。后稀释CVVH和CVVHD的尿素清除率均为11.3 mL/min,比前稀释CVVH的尿素清除率9.8 mL/min高15%(p<0.005)。后稀释CVVH的肌酐清除率(10.7 mL/min)比前稀释CVVH的清除率9.0 mL/min高15%(p<0.01)。在前稀释CVVH和CVVHD中,当置换液(CVVH)或透析液(CVVHD)流速分别为血流速率的33%和50%时进行比较。由于存在血液浓缩的潜在问题,后稀释CVVH未在高超滤率下进行。在两种流速下CVVHD的尿素和肌酐清除率在统计学上均优于前稀释CVVH。

结论

在尿素和肌酐清除方面,CVVHD优于前稀释CVVH。后稀释CVVH和CVVHD的清除率几乎相等。在儿科患者使用的低血流速率下,人们担心后稀释CVVH期间的高超滤会导致过度血液浓缩和滤器凝血,而CVVHD似乎是CRRT期间使小溶质清除率最大化的最佳方式。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验