Blaivas Jerry G, Flisser Adam J, Bleustein Clifford B, Panagopoulos Georgia
Joan and Sanford Weill College of Medicine, Cornell University, New York, New York 10021, USA.
Obstet Gynecol. 2004 May;103(5 Pt 1):842-7. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000124848.63750.e6.
To describe the differential diagnosis of periurethral masses in a consecutive series extracted from a single tertiary urogynecologic practice database.
A patient database of a private urology and urogynecology practice with 1,950 women was searched for patients who were found to have a periurethral mass during the accrual dates of 1994 to 2002, and these records were reviewed for diagnostic testing and results. All women provided a history, completed a questionnaire, and underwent physical examination, voiding diary, cystoscopy, and videourodynamic testing; selected patients then underwent additional imaging.
Seventy-nine (4%) patients aged 41.2 +/- 14 years were identified. Of these, 72 (91%) had been referred for evaluation of persistent irritative lower urinary tract symptoms or incontinence. Seven patients (9%) had been referred specifically because of a periurethral mass. Sixty-six patients (84%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 73%, 91%) had urethral diverticula, of which 4 (6%; 95% CI 2%, 14.8%) contained malignancies. Six patients (7%; 95% CI 3%, 15%) had vaginal cysts histologically identified as fibromuscular tissue, 4 (5%; 95% CI 1%, 12%) had leiomyomata, and 2 (2.5%; 95% CI 0.03%, 8.8%) had ectopic ureteroceles. Two patients had vaginal squamous cell carcinomas (2.5%; 95% CI 0.03%, 8.8%), and 1 had an infected granuloma. Masses were palpable in 42 patients (53.8%; 95% CI 42%, 64%) and in 37 patients either were encountered at surgery (n = 5) or were urethral diverticula diagnosed by voiding cystourethrogram (n = 32).
Periurethral masses were encountered in less than 4% of our patient sample. Most masses were urethral diverticula; however, the differential diagnosis included leiomyoma, vaginal cysts, and malignancy. Masses were generally either palpable or seen at imaging studies performed during evaluation of lower urinary tract symptoms.
描述从单一三级泌尿妇科实践数据库中连续选取的一系列患者的尿道周围肿块的鉴别诊断。
在一个拥有1950名女性患者的私立泌尿外科和泌尿妇科实践患者数据库中,搜索1994年至2002年收集期间被发现有尿道周围肿块的患者,并审查这些记录的诊断测试及结果。所有女性均提供了病史,完成了问卷调查,并接受了体格检查、排尿日记、膀胱镜检查和影像尿动力学测试;部分患者随后接受了额外的影像学检查。
共识别出79名(4%)年龄为41.2±14岁的患者。其中,72名(91%)因持续性刺激性下尿路症状或尿失禁转诊评估。7名患者(9%)因尿道周围肿块被专门转诊。66名患者(84%;95%置信区间[CI]73%,91%)患有尿道憩室,其中4名(6%;95%CI2%,14.8%)含有恶性肿瘤。6名患者(7%;95%CI3%,15%)经组织学鉴定为纤维肌肉组织的阴道囊肿,4名(5%;95%CI1%,12%)患有平滑肌瘤,2名(2.5%;95%CI0.03%,8.8%)患有异位输尿管囊肿。2名患者患有阴道鳞状细胞癌(2.5%;95%CI0.03%,8.8%),1名患有感染性肉芽肿。42名患者(53.8%;95%CI42%,64%)可触及肿块,37名患者的肿块要么在手术中发现(n = 5),要么通过排尿膀胱尿道造影诊断为尿道憩室(n = 32)。
在我们的患者样本中,尿道周围肿块的发生率不到4%。大多数肿块为尿道憩室;然而,鉴别诊断包括平滑肌瘤、阴道囊肿和恶性肿瘤。肿块通常可触及或在评估下尿路症状期间进行的影像学检查中发现。