Peng Xiaohui, Hussain S Farzana, Paterson Yvonne
Department of Microbiology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
J Immunol. 2004 May 15;172(10):6030-8. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.172.10.6030.
Previous work from our laboratory has shown that Lm-LLO-E7 induces complete regression of approximately 75% of established TC-1 tumors, whereas Lm-E7 only slows the growth of such tumors. In this study, we examine the effects of Lm-LLO-E7 vs Lm-E7 on APCs. We hypothesize that the difference in antitumor efficacy of the two vaccines is due to the ability of each of these vectors to render immature dendritic cells (DCs) effective APCs in terms of MHC class II or costimulatory molecule expression. We also examine the ability of these vectors to stimulate cytokine production by DCs. Both vectors induced IL-12 and TNF-alpha, but only Lm-LLO-E7 induced IL-2 production by DCs. Lm-LLO-E7 also induced significantly higher levels of MHC class II molecules, CD40, and B7 costimulatory molecules (CD86, B7-H1, and B7-DC) on DCs than Lm-E7. Interestingly, a shift of CD11c(+) cells from CD86(low) to CD86(high) is observed post-Lm-LLO-E7 infection. A similar shift is also observed for B7-H1 and B7-DC molecules. Moreover, Lm-LLO-E7, but not Lm-E7-pulsed DCs, stimulate naive T cell proliferation. These results indicate that Lm-LLO-E7 is more effective than Lm-E7 at inducing DC maturation. This effect is independent of the E7 Ag, because Lm-LLO-NP, and a mixture of Lm-LLO-NP and Lm-E7 induce the same changes in DC phenotype as Lm-LLO-E7. Taken together, the changes in DC expression correlate well with the differences in antitumor efficacy between these two vaccines.
我们实验室之前的研究表明,Lm-LLO-E7可使约75%已形成的TC-1肿瘤完全消退,而Lm-E7仅能减缓此类肿瘤的生长。在本研究中,我们检测了Lm-LLO-E7与Lm-E7对抗原呈递细胞(APC)的影响。我们推测这两种疫苗在抗肿瘤疗效上的差异是由于这两种载体各自使未成熟树突状细胞(DC)在MHC II类分子或共刺激分子表达方面成为有效的APC的能力不同。我们还检测了这些载体刺激DC产生细胞因子的能力。两种载体均能诱导IL-12和TNF-α产生,但只有Lm-LLO-E7能诱导DC产生IL-2。与Lm-E7相比,Lm-LLO-E7还能显著诱导DC上更高水平的MHC II类分子、CD40和B7共刺激分子(CD86、B7-H1和B7-DC)表达。有趣的是,在Lm-LLO-E7感染后,观察到CD11c(+)细胞从CD86(低)向CD86(高)转变。B7-H1和B7-DC分子也观察到类似转变。此外,Lm-LLO-E7而非Lm-E7脉冲DC能刺激初始T细胞增殖。这些结果表明,Lm-LLO-E7在诱导DC成熟方面比Lm-E7更有效。这种效应与E7抗原无关,因为Lm-LLO-NP以及Lm-LLO-NP和Lm-E7的混合物在DC表型上诱导的变化与Lm-LLO-E7相同。综上所述,DC表达的变化与这两种疫苗在抗肿瘤疗效上的差异密切相关。