Vucković Aleksandra, Rijkhoff Nico J M, Struijk Johannes J
Center for Sensory Motor Interaction, Aalborg University, DK-9220 Aalborg, Denmark.
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2004 May;51(5):698-706. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2004.826663.
The aim of this study was to investigate whether it is possible to reduce a charge per pulse, which is needed for selective nerve stimulation. Simulation is performed using a two-part simulation model: a volume conductor model to calculate the electrical potential distribution inside a tripolar cuff electrode and a human fiber model to simulate the fiber response to simulation. Selective stimulation is obtained by anodal block. To obtain anodal block of large fibers, long square pulses (> 350 micros) with a relatively high currents (1-2.5 mA) are usually required. These pulses might not be safe for a long-term application because of a high charge per pulse. In this study, several pulse shapes are proposed that have less charge per pulse compared with the conventional square pulse and would therefore be safer in a chronic application. Compared with the conventional square pulse, it was possible to reduce the charge with all proposed pulse shapes, but the best results are obtained with a combination of a square depolarizing pulse and a blocking pulse. The charge per pulse was up to 32% less with that pulse shape than with a square pulse. Using a hyperpolarizing anodal prepulse preceding a square pulse, it was not possible to block nerve fibers in a whole nerve bundle and to obtain reduction of a charge per phase. Reduction of the charge could be achieved only with spatially selective blocking. The charge per phase was larger for the combination of a hyperpolarizing anodal prepulse and a two-step pulse than for the two-step pulse alone.
本研究的目的是调查是否有可能降低选择性神经刺激所需的每脉冲电荷量。使用两部分模拟模型进行模拟:一个体积导体模型,用于计算三极袖带电极内部的电势分布;一个人体纤维模型,用于模拟纤维对模拟的反应。通过阳极阻滞获得选择性刺激。为了实现大纤维的阳极阻滞,通常需要使用具有相对高电流(1 - 2.5 mA)的长方波脉冲(> 350微秒)。由于每脉冲电荷量高,这些脉冲可能不适用于长期应用。在本研究中,提出了几种脉冲形状,与传统方波脉冲相比,它们每脉冲的电荷量更少,因此在长期应用中更安全。与传统方波脉冲相比,所有提出的脉冲形状都有可能降低电荷量,但使用方波去极化脉冲和阻滞脉冲的组合可获得最佳结果。该脉冲形状的每脉冲电荷量比方波脉冲减少了高达32%。在方波脉冲之前使用超极化阳极预脉冲,无法阻滞整个神经束中的神经纤维,也无法实现每相电荷量的减少。只有通过空间选择性阻滞才能实现电荷量的减少。超极化阳极预脉冲和两步脉冲组合的每相电荷量比单独的两步脉冲更大。