Suppr超能文献

类风湿性关节炎和骨关节炎患者使用COX-2特异性抑制剂和非特异性非甾体抗炎药之间的药物转换模式。

Drug switching patterns among patients with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis using COX-2 specific inhibitors and non-specific NSAIDs.

作者信息

Zhao Sean Z, Wentworth Chuck, Burke Thomas A, Makuch Robert W

机构信息

Pharmacia Global Health Outcomes, Peapack, NJ, USA.

出版信息

Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2004 May;13(5):277-87. doi: 10.1002/pds.909.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare RA and OA patients' time-to-switch after newly initiating treatment with three most commonly used non-specific (NS)-NSAIDs and two COX-2 inhibitors, celecoxib and rofecoxib.

METHODS

Managed care enrollees newly prescribed celecoxib, rofecoxib, ibuprofen, naproxen or diclofenac were identified. Time to switch to a different NS-NSAID or COX-2 specific inhibitor was determined using time-to-event analysis and Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the odds ratio (OR) after controlling for potential confounders.

RESULTS

The time to 25% of the cohort switching was longer for rofecoxib and celecoxib (159 and 205 days respectively) compared to the three NS-NSAIDs (49-78 days). Patients were at the highest risk of switching within the first 100 days of therapy. After adjusting for potential confounding factors, the OR for switching to another NS-NSAID or COX-2 specific inhibitor ranged from 1.74 to 2.35 for the three NS-NSAIDs compared to celecoxib (all comparisons, p < 0.01). Similar findings were obtained when comparing rofecoxib to each of the three NS-NSAIDS (all comparisons, p < 0.01). When COX-2 inhibitors combined were compared to NS-NSAIDS combined, the OR for switching was 1.53 (95% confidence interval = 1.42-1.65; p < 0.01) after adjusting for potential confounders.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients on the COX-2 specific inhibitors (celecoxib and rofecoxib) were significantly less likely to switch their therapy than patients on NS-NSAIDS (ibuprofen, naproxen and diclofenac). These results suggest that COX-2 specific inhibitors may be a more effective treatment option when compared with NS-NSAIDs in usual clinical practice.

摘要

目的

比较类风湿性关节炎(RA)和骨关节炎(OA)患者在新开始使用三种最常用的非特异性(NS)非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)以及两种环氧化酶-2(COX-2)抑制剂塞来昔布和罗非昔布治疗后的换药时间。

方法

确定新开具塞来昔布、罗非昔布、布洛芬、萘普生或双氯芬酸处方的管理式医疗参保者。使用事件发生时间分析确定换用不同的NS-NSAIDs或COX-2特异性抑制剂的时间,并使用Cox比例风险模型在控制潜在混杂因素后估计比值比(OR)。

结果

与三种NS-NSAIDs(49 - 78天)相比,罗非昔布和塞来昔布(分别为159天和205天)的队列中25%患者换药的时间更长。患者在治疗的前100天内换药风险最高。在调整潜在混杂因素后,与塞来昔布相比,三种NS-NSAIDs换用另一种NS-NSAIDs或COX-2特异性抑制剂的OR范围为1.74至2.35(所有比较,p < 0.01)。将罗非昔布与三种NS-NSAIDs中的每一种进行比较时也获得了类似结果(所有比较,p < 0.01)。在调整潜在混杂因素后,将联合使用的COX-2抑制剂与联合使用的NS-NSAIDs进行比较时,换药的OR为1.53(95%置信区间 = 1.42 - 1.65;p < 0.01)。

结论

与使用NS-NSAIDs(布洛芬、萘普生和双氯芬酸)的患者相比,使用COX-2特异性抑制剂(塞来昔布和罗非昔布)的患者换药的可能性显著降低。这些结果表明,在常规临床实践中,与NS-NSAIDs相比,COX-2特异性抑制剂可能是一种更有效的治疗选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验