Zarcone Troy J, Chen Rong, Fowler Stephen C
Life Span Institute, University of Kansas, 1000 Sunnyside Avenue, 1052 Dole Building, Lawrence, KS 66045-7775, USA.
Behav Brain Res. 2004 Jun 4;152(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2003.09.010.
Developments in the genetic manipulation of mice have intensified interest in the relation between genes, environment and learned behavior, which in turn has led to exploration of experimental procedures for assessing genetic influences on learning using methods such as response acquisition. The requirement for multiple experimental control groups in such genetic comparisons studies amplifies the need for reliable, instrument-directed, learning assessment paradigms. The purpose of the present experiment was to implement such a procedure in several successive phases, including pre-food basal rates of interaction with sensors in a chamber, food-hopper training, and a simple disk-baiting procedure that produced differentially food-reinforced disk pressing (FR1) and provided quantitative measures of learning in outbred (CD-1) and inbred (C57BL/6J, BALB/cJ) mice. Response acquisition performances were measured in terms of the number of correct food-producing responses (disk press to hopper entry in less than 5s). The three mouse types showed differences in several performance measures prior to response acquisition training. Pre-food basal performances did not predict subsequent rate of acquisition of the target response. On average, CD-1 mice met a criterion of 50 food-producing responses slightly, but not significantly, faster than BALB/cJ mice. The C57BL/6J mice took significantly longer to meet the learning criterion and had slower response rates, due to longer after-reinforcement pausing. Procedural differences (massed versus partial/distributed training) and reinforcement parameters (duration of access) may differentially affect different mouse types independently of genetic differences in response acquisition.
小鼠基因操作方面的进展激发了人们对基因、环境与习得行为之间关系的浓厚兴趣,这反过来又促使人们探索使用诸如反应习得等方法来评估基因对学习影响的实验程序。在这类基因比较研究中,对多个实验对照组的需求增加了对可靠的、仪器导向的学习评估范式的需求。本实验的目的是在几个连续阶段实施这样一种程序,包括在一个实验箱中与传感器互动的食物前基础速率、食槽训练,以及一个简单的圆盘诱饵程序,该程序产生不同的食物强化圆盘按压(FR1),并为远交系(CD-1)和近交系(C57BL/6J、BALB/cJ)小鼠的学习提供定量测量。反应习得表现通过正确的产生食物反应的数量来衡量(在不到5秒内从圆盘按压到食槽进入)。在反应习得训练之前,这三种小鼠类型在几个表现指标上存在差异。食物前基础表现并不能预测随后目标反应的习得速率。平均而言,CD-1小鼠达到50次产生食物反应的标准比BALB/cJ小鼠略快,但不显著。C57BL/6J小鼠达到学习标准所需的时间明显更长,反应速率也更慢,这是由于强化后停顿时间更长。程序差异(集中训练与部分/分散训练)和强化参数(获取持续时间)可能独立于反应习得中的基因差异而对不同小鼠类型产生不同影响。