Suppr超能文献

小儿癫痫综合征严重程度评分的制定。

Development of syndrome severity scores for pediatric epilepsy.

作者信息

Dunn David W, Buelow Janice M, Austin Joan K, Shinnar Shlomo, Perkins Susan M

机构信息

Departments of Psychiatry and Neurology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.

出版信息

Epilepsia. 2004 Jun;45(6):661-6. doi: 10.1111/j.0013-9580.2004.53903.x.

Abstract

PURPOSE

A severity rating for each of the pediatric epilepsy syndromes can contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of seizure condition severity. We describe the development of the Epilepsy Syndrome Severity Scores-Child (ESSS-C).

METHODS

The Delphi Technique was used to establish severity scores for pediatric epileptic syndromes as defined by the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE). Pediatric neurologists with expertise in epilepsy were asked to rate the severity of each syndrome on a scale of 1 to 10, considering: (a) response to medical treatment, (b) seizure severity, and (c) long-term prognosis. Syndrome severity ratings took place in four different rounds. Experts provided initial scores in rounds 1 and 2.

RESULTS

Of the 18 experts who agreed to participate in the development of the scale, 12 completed all four rounds. The median served as the syndrome severity score if the mean and median agreed within 0.5. Otherwise, whichever of these two numbers was closest to the mode was selected. Syndromes that were rated with high severity scores (9 or 10) or low severity scores (1 or 2) had unanimous or near unanimous ratings. The syndromes with scores in the middle range (4 to 8) had a wider range of ratings.

CONCLUSIONS

If further studies provide empirical support for the validity of these epileptic syndrome severity scores, then the ESSS-C has potential for use both clinically and in future research in the prediction of outcomes of treatments.

摘要

目的

对每种小儿癫痫综合征进行严重程度评级有助于更全面地了解癫痫发作状况的严重程度。我们描述了儿童癫痫综合征严重程度评分(ESSS-C)的制定过程。

方法

采用德尔菲技术为国际抗癫痫联盟(ILAE)定义的小儿癫痫综合征建立严重程度评分。邀请在癫痫领域有专长的小儿神经科医生按照1至10的评分标准对每种综合征的严重程度进行评分,评分时需考虑:(a)对药物治疗的反应;(b)癫痫发作的严重程度;(c)长期预后。综合征严重程度评级分四轮进行。专家们在第1轮和第2轮中给出初始评分。

结果

同意参与该量表制定的18位专家中,有12位完成了全部四轮评分。如果平均数和中位数相差在0.5以内,则取中位数作为综合征严重程度评分。否则,选择这两个数字中最接近众数的那个。严重程度评分高(9或10)或低(1或2)的综合征评级一致或几乎一致。评分处于中等范围(4至8)的综合征评级范围更广。

结论

如果进一步的研究为这些癫痫综合征严重程度评分的有效性提供实证支持,那么ESSS-C在临床和未来治疗结果预测研究中均有应用潜力。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验