Carter Troy L, Rissman Robert A, Mishizen-Eberz Amanda J, Wolfe Barry B, Hamilton Ronald L, Gandy Sam, Armstrong David M
Laboratory of Neuronal Vulnerability and Aging, The Lankenau Institute for Medical Research, Jefferson Health System, Wynewood, PA 19096, USA.
Exp Neurol. 2004 Jun;187(2):299-309. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2003.12.010.
The Alzheimer's disease (AD) brain, characterized pathologically by the presence of senile plaques and neurofibrillary tangles, contains regions that are differentially prone toward development of AD pathology. Within these "vulnerable" regions, specific cell populations appear to be selectively affected; the pyramidal cells of the hippocampal subiculum subfield constitute such a vulnerable region. This study investigated whether the AMPA receptor subunit content (GluR1, GluR2, GluR2/3) within "vulnerable" vs. "resistant" sectors of the hippocampus is quantitatively altered with increasing AD neuropathology, as determined by Braak staging. We hypothesize that the glutamate-mediated vulnerability is highly influenced by the repertoire of glutamate receptors expressed on hippocampal neurons. Our results indicate that AMPA receptor subunit proteins are relatively spared across all Braak stages in resistant subfields (CA2/CA3/Dentate Gyrus). However, within vulnerable sectors, i.e., subiculum, GluR2, and GluR2/3 protein levels decreased 63.77% and 60.60%, respectively, in association with Braak stages I-II and stages III-IV, respectively. In Braak stages V-VI, GluR2 and GluR2/3 protein levels were similar to those of Braak stages I-II. In contrast to GluR2 and GluR2/3, GluR1 protein levels were unchanged within vulnerable sectors throughout all stages of the disease. In interpreting these data, it may be relevant to consider that the GluR2 subunit impedes the flow of Ca(+2) through the AMPA receptor ion channel. Thus, we hypothesize that in resistant sectors, the presence of the GluR2 subunit may provide a neuroprotective role by limiting the flow of extracellular Ca(+2), whereas in vulnerable regions, the reduction of GluR2 may contribute to the vulnerability via a mechanism involving an increase in intracellular Ca(+2) and destabilization of intracellular Ca(+2) homeostasis.
阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者的大脑在病理上以存在老年斑和神经原纤维缠结为特征,其中不同区域对AD病理发展的易感性存在差异。在这些“易损”区域内,特定细胞群似乎受到选择性影响;海马下托亚区的锥体细胞就构成这样一个易损区域。本研究调查了随着AD神经病理学进展(通过Braak分期确定),海马“易损”区与“抗损”区中AMPA受体亚基含量(GluR1、GluR2、GluR2/3)是否发生定量改变。我们假设谷氨酸介导的易损性受海马神经元上表达的谷氨酸受体种类的高度影响。我们的结果表明,在抗损亚区(CA2/CA3/齿状回),所有Braak分期的AMPA受体亚基蛋白相对未受影响。然而,在易损区,即下托,与Braak I-II期和III-IV期相关,GluR2和GluR2/3蛋白水平分别下降了63.77%和60.60%。在Braak V-VI期,GluR2和GluR2/3蛋白水平与Braak I-II期相似。与GluR2和GluR2/3不同,在疾病的所有阶段,易损区内的GluR1蛋白水平均未改变。在解释这些数据时,可能需要考虑到GluR2亚基会阻碍Ca(+2)通过AMPA受体离子通道流动。因此,我们假设在抗损区,GluR2亚基的存在可能通过限制细胞外Ca(+2)流动发挥神经保护作用,而在易损区,GluR2的减少可能通过涉及细胞内Ca(+2)增加和细胞内Ca(+2)稳态破坏的机制导致易损性增加。