Suppr超能文献

正常及移植后的外侧膝关节半月板:利用磁共振成像和超声评估半月板挤出情况

Normal and transplanted lateral knee menisci: evaluation of extrusion using magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound.

作者信息

Verdonk Peter, Depaepe Yves, Desmyter Stefan, De Muynck Martine, Almqvist Karl Fredrik, Verstraete Koenraad, Verdonk René

机构信息

Department of Physical Medicine and Orthopaedic Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, De Pintelaan 185, 9000 Gent, Belgium.

出版信息

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2004 Sep;12(5):411-9. doi: 10.1007/s00167-004-0500-1. Epub 2004 May 14.

Abstract

The aim of the study is to develop a clinically useful and reproducible method for evaluating lateral meniscal extrusion in normal and transplanted knees under different axial loading conditions. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound (US) were used to assess meniscal extrusion. Both types of imaging were performed at least 6 months postoperatively (mean 23.5 months). Coronal MR images (DESS-3D sequence) of the lateral compartments of 10 normal knees and 17 transplanted lateral knees were analyzed. Extrusion was defined as the distance measured from the femoral condyle or tibial plateau to the outer edge of the meniscus. Subjects were examined in the supine position. Ultrasound print-outs of the lateral compartment of both knees of ten patients (transplanted side and contralateral normal side) were analyzed. Extrusion cross-sectional area (CSA) and distance were measured just anterior to the lateral collateral ligament: the former was defined as the CSA of the meniscus outside the knee, the latter as the greatest distance from a line connecting the femur and tibia to the outer edge of the lateral meniscus. Patients were examined in the supine position, bipodal stance and unipodal stance. The viable meniscal allograft was securely sutured to a bleeding functional meniscal rim. No bone blocks were used to fix the allograft; instead, the anterior and posterior horn were firmly sutured to their enthesis. The MRI results (tibial) show the transplanted lateral meniscus to be significantly (p<0.005) more extruded in comparison to the normal lateral meniscus. The anterior horn (mean 5.8 mm, SD=2.8) of the transplanted lateral meniscus tends to be more extruded than the posterior horn (mean 2.7 mm, SD=1.48). The posterior horn of the normal lateral meniscus does not (mean 0 mm) extrude, while the mean extrusion of the anterior horn is 0.8 mm (SD=0.92). In the US results, the transplanted lateral meniscus is significantly (p<0.005) more extruded than the normal lateral meniscus in all patient positions. Both cross-sectional surface and distance are equally good parameters to determine meniscal extrusion. There is no statistical difference between patient positions. The transplanted lateral meniscus extrudes, in the supine position, bipodal and unipodal stance 6.43 (SD=1.84), 6.01 (SD=1.93) and 6.99 mm (SD=2.7) respectively. The extrusion surface of the lateral transplanted meniscus is 50.50 mm2 (SD=15.32), 47.24 mm2 (SD=14.35) and 58.61 mm2 (SD=29.65) in the supine position, bipodal stance and unipodal stance respectively. The normal lateral meniscus extrudes in the supine position, bipodal and unipodal stance 3.77 (SD=1.76), 3.94 (SD=1.66) and 3.79 mm (SD=1.79) respectively. The extrusion surface of the normal lateral meniscus is 22.42 mm2 (SD=12.54), 23.24 mm2 (SD=12.74) and 24.79 mm2 (SD=10.18) in the supine position, bipodal stance and unipodal stance respectively. The presented data shows that the transplanted lateral meniscus, without bone block fixation but with firm fixation of the horns to the original entheses, extrudes in the lateral direction significantly more than the normal meniscus. The transplanted lateral meniscus, however, does not extrude more in the lateral direction under axial load. The anterior horn of both normal and transplanted menisci is extruded more laterally than the posterior horn. Both methods are adequate to measure laterally-directed extrusion of the normal and transplanted lateral meniscus, but have distinctive advantages and disadvantages: MRI in this series visualizes the complete-from posterior to anterior-meniscal body, but only in the supine, non-weight-bearing position. Using ultrasound one can evaluate the meniscal extrusion in different conditions of axial loading, but only from a single examination point.

摘要

本研究的目的是开发一种临床实用且可重复的方法,用于评估正常膝关节和移植膝关节在不同轴向负荷条件下的外侧半月板挤出情况。采用磁共振成像(MRI)和超声(US)评估半月板挤出情况。两种成像均在术后至少6个月进行(平均23.5个月)。分析了10个正常膝关节和17个移植外侧膝关节外侧间室的冠状面MR图像(DESS-3D序列)。挤出定义为从股骨髁或胫骨平台到半月板外缘的测量距离。受试者仰卧位接受检查。分析了10例患者双膝(移植侧和对侧正常侧)外侧间室的超声打印图像。在外侧副韧带前方测量挤出横截面积(CSA)和距离:前者定义为膝关节外半月板的CSA,后者定义为连接股骨和胫骨的线到外侧半月板外缘的最大距离。患者分别在仰卧位、双足站立位和单足站立位接受检查。将存活的半月板同种异体移植物牢固缝合至有血运的功能性半月板边缘。未使用骨块固定同种异体移植物;相反,前后角牢固缝合至其附着处。MRI结果(胫骨侧)显示,与正常外侧半月板相比,移植的外侧半月板挤出明显更多(p<0.005)。移植外侧半月板的前角(平均5.8 mm,标准差=2.8)比后角(平均2.7 mm,标准差=1.48)更容易挤出。正常外侧半月板的后角不挤出(平均0 mm),而前角的平均挤出为0.8 mm(标准差=0.92)。在超声检查结果中,在所有患者体位下,移植的外侧半月板比正常外侧半月板挤出明显更多(p<0.005)。横截面积和距离都是确定半月板挤出的同样良好的参数。患者体位之间无统计学差异。移植的外侧半月板在仰卧位、双足站立位和单足站立位的挤出量分别为6.43(标准差=1.84)、6.01(标准差=1.93)和6.99 mm(标准差=2.7)。移植外侧半月板在仰卧位、双足站立位和单足站立位的挤出面积分别为50.50 mm2(标准差=15.32)、47.24 mm2(标准差=14.35)和58.61 mm2(标准差=29.65)。正常外侧半月板在仰卧位、双足站立位和单足站立位的挤出量分别为3.77(标准差=1.76)、3.94(标准差=1.66)和3.79 mm(标准差=1.79)。正常外侧半月板在仰卧位、双足站立位和单足站立位的挤出面积分别为22.42 mm2(标准差=12.54)、23.24 mm2(标准差=12.74)和24.79 mm2(标准差=10.18)。所呈现的数据表明,未使用骨块固定但角部牢固固定于原附着处的移植外侧半月板,在外侧方向的挤出明显多于正常半月板。然而,移植外侧半月板在轴向负荷下在外侧方向的挤出并不更多。正常和移植半月板的前角比后角在外侧挤出更多。两种方法都足以测量正常和移植外侧半月板外侧方向的挤出,但有各自独特的优缺点:本系列中的MRI可显示完整的——从后到前——半月板体部,但仅在仰卧位、非负重体位。使用超声可以在不同轴向负荷条件下评估半月板挤出,但仅从单个检查点进行。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验