Kvietys P R, Specian R D, Cepinskas G
Department of Physiology, Louisiana State University Medical Center, Shreveport 71130.
Am J Physiol. 1992 Aug;263(2 Pt 1):G224-9. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.1992.263.2.G224.
Effects of putrescine, spermidine, and spermine on lipid-induced injury to jejunal mucosa were assessed in anesthetized rats. Mucosal epithelial integrity was continuously monitored by measuring blood-to-lumen clearance of 51Cr-labeled EDTA. Perfusion of jejunal lumen with emulsified lipid (20 mM sodium taurocholate and 40 mM oleic acid) increased 51Cr-EDTA clearance. Addition of spermidine (0.5 mM), but not putrescine (2.0 mM) or spermine (0.25 mM), to the lipid perfusate reduced the increment in 51Cr-EDTA clearance. Histological evaluation of jejunal mucosa indicated that the epithelial lining of the villous tips was damaged by emulsified oleic acid and that this injury was ameliorated by spermidine. Pretreatment of jejunal mucosa with spermidine did not prevent disruption of mucosal integrity induced by a subsequent perfusion with emulsified lipids. Intravenous infusion of spermidine to achieve an extracellular concentration of 0.5 mM did not prevent the lipid-induced increase in 51Cr-EDTA. Spermidine also ameliorated lipid-induced disruption of Caco-2 cell monolayers in culture; this protective effect was dose dependent and was observed only when spermidine was applied to the apical aspect of the monolayers. These findings indicate that spermidine must be present on the apical portion of the epithelial cell during lipid insult. Substitution of lysine or arginine for spermidine did not reduce the extent of lipid-induced injury to jejunal mucosa, indicating that spermidine's protective effects cannot simply be attributed to its cationic nature. Spermidine did not alter the turbidity of a micellar oleic acid solution, indicating that spermidine was not removing oleic acid from the soluble phase.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
在麻醉大鼠中评估了腐胺、亚精胺和精胺对脂质诱导的空肠黏膜损伤的影响。通过测量51Cr标记的EDTA从血液到肠腔的清除率来持续监测黏膜上皮的完整性。用乳化脂质(20 mM牛磺胆酸钠和40 mM油酸)灌注空肠腔会增加51Cr-EDTA的清除率。在脂质灌注液中添加亚精胺(0.5 mM)可降低51Cr-EDTA清除率的增加,但添加腐胺(2.0 mM)或精胺(0.25 mM)则无此作用。空肠黏膜的组织学评估表明,绒毛尖端的上皮衬里受到乳化油酸的损伤,而亚精胺可改善这种损伤。用亚精胺预处理空肠黏膜并不能防止随后用乳化脂质灌注引起的黏膜完整性破坏。静脉输注亚精胺以达到细胞外浓度0.5 mM并不能防止脂质诱导的51Cr-EDTA增加。亚精胺还可改善培养的Caco-2细胞单层中脂质诱导的破坏;这种保护作用呈剂量依赖性,且仅当亚精胺应用于单层的顶端时才观察到。这些发现表明,在脂质损伤期间,亚精胺必须存在于上皮细胞的顶端部分。用赖氨酸或精氨酸替代亚精胺并不能降低脂质诱导的空肠黏膜损伤程度,这表明亚精胺的保护作用不能简单地归因于其阳离子性质。亚精胺不会改变胶束油酸溶液的浊度,表明亚精胺不会从可溶相中去除油酸。(摘要截断于250字)