Ehrenberger Heidi E, Lillington Linda
College of Nursing at the University of Tennessee in Knoxville, USA.
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2004 May 12;31(3):E64-8. doi: 10.1188/04.ONF.E64-E68. Print 2004 May.
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To identify the significant dimensions of the clinical trials nursing role and to construct a reliable and valid survey instrument to reflect these dimensions.
Methodologic survey.
SETTING/SAMPLE: The judge panel consisted of six national nurse experts. The focus group sample was comprised of 24 clinical research nurses from the West, Northeast, and Great Lakes regions of the United States and five research nurses from Canada. The sample for instrument testing consisted of 40 oncology clinical research nurses from the Southeast.
Several strategies were used to develop the Clinical Trials Nursing Questionnaire (CTNQ): literature review, conceptualization of the subscales, development of items for each subscale, development of the tool, expert judge panel evaluation, focus group testing, administration of the tool, and psychometric analysis of the results.
Frequency and importance of clinical trials nursing activities.
Content validity was established at 0.95. The alpha reliability coefficient was 0.92 for the frequency scale and 0.95 for the importance scale. A two-week test-retest reliability of 0.88 was obtained for the frequency scale and 0.92 for the importance scale. The final CTNQ contained 12 sections with 154 items.
The CTNQ has acceptable content validity, internal consistency, and stability reliability. This instrument is promising for the assessment of the research nurse role, and its use in further research is appropriate.
A valid and reliable measure can be used to delineate the subspecialty of clinical trials nursing, thus providing a better understanding of how nursing professionals contribute to the cancer research enterprise.
目的/目标:确定临床试验护理角色的重要维度,并构建一个可靠且有效的调查问卷来反映这些维度。
方法学调查。
设置/样本:评审小组由六位全国护士专家组成。焦点小组样本包括来自美国西部、东北部和五大湖地区的24名临床研究护士以及来自加拿大的五名研究护士。用于工具测试的样本包括来自东南部的40名肿瘤临床研究护士。
采用多种策略来开发临床试验护理问卷(CTNQ):文献综述、子量表概念化、每个子量表项目的开发、工具的开发、专家评审小组评估、焦点小组测试、工具的应用以及结果的心理测量分析。
临床试验护理活动的频率和重要性。
内容效度确定为0.95。频率量表的α信度系数为0.92,重要性量表的α信度系数为0.95。频率量表的两周重测信度为0.88,重要性量表的两周重测信度为0.92。最终的CTNQ包含12个部分,共154个项目。
CTNQ具有可接受的内容效度、内部一致性和稳定性信度。该工具在评估研究护士角色方面很有前景,适用于进一步的研究。
一个有效且可靠的测量工具可用于界定临床试验护理亚专业,从而更好地理解护理专业人员如何为癌症研究事业做出贡献。