Abo Tomoko, Uno Shigeru, Sano Hidehiko
Section of Cariology, Operative Dentistry and Endodontology, Department of Oral Health Science, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Dental Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
Eur J Oral Sci. 2004 Jun;112(3):286-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2004.00126.x.
The aim of this study was to compare the bonding efficacy of an all-in-one adhesive with that of a self-etching primer system by measuring microleakage after thermocycling and the microtensile bond strength (microTBS) to enamel and dentin. Circular class V cavities along cement-enamel junctions were prepared in 20 extracted human premolars. Each 10 teeth were bonded with either AD Bond (AD) or Clearfil SE Bond (SE), and filled with a resin composite (Charisma). After thermocycling and staining with 0.5% basic fuchsin, the microleakage at the coronal and apical walls was evaluated using longitudinal sections. In addition 20 premolars were used to measure microTBS at 24 h after bonding for these adhesives to enamel and dentin that corresponded to the coronal and apical walls of the class V cavities. AD showed more microleakage than SE in the coronal walls, but there was less microleakage in the apical walls and no difference in apical leakage between the two adhesives. microTBS (SD) in MPa to enamel and dentin were 25.2 (7.3) and 68.3 (9.4) for AD, and 35.8 (7.4) and 76.4 (7.8) for SE, respectively. AD gave a lower microTBS to enamel than did SE. The results suggested that the poor adaptation at the coronal wall in AD might be caused by the lower bond strength to enamel.
本研究的目的是通过测量热循环后的微渗漏以及与釉质和牙本质的微拉伸粘结强度(microTBS),比较一种多合一粘结剂与一种自酸蚀底漆系统的粘结效果。在20颗拔除的人类前磨牙上沿着牙骨质 - 釉质界制备圆形V类洞。每组10颗牙齿分别用AD Bond(AD)或Clearfil SE Bond(SE)粘结,并用树脂复合材料(Charisma)充填。热循环并经0.5%碱性品红染色后,使用纵剖面评估冠壁和根尖壁的微渗漏。此外,使用20颗前磨牙在粘结后24小时测量这些粘结剂与对应于V类洞冠壁和根尖壁的釉质和牙本质的microTBS。AD在冠壁的微渗漏比SE多,但在根尖壁的微渗漏较少,且两种粘结剂在根尖渗漏方面无差异。AD与釉质和牙本质的microTBS(标准差),以MPa计,分别为25.2(7.3)和68.3(9.4),SE分别为35.8(7.4)和76.4(7.8)。AD与釉质的microTBS低于SE。结果表明,AD在冠壁适应性差可能是由于与釉质的粘结强度较低所致。