Comparison of filters in an oversized vena caval phantom: intracaval placement of a bird's nest filter versus biiliac placement of Greenfield, Vena Tech-LGM, and Simon nitinol filters.

For patients with an oversized inferior vena cava (IVC) (diameter greater than 28 mm, corrected for magnification) who require vena caval filtration for prophylaxis against pulmonary emboli, the accepted treatment has been the biiliac venous placement of Greenfield filters. Because of its wide strut span, the Bird's Nest filter (BNF) has been successfully placed in patients having an oversized IVC. However, the effects of the BNF on caval blood flow and its clot-capturing ability in an oversized IVC are not clearly understood. The authors created a flow phantom simulating an oversized IVC with "iliac" tributaries of normal inner diameter to analyze flow turbulence, pressure gradients, and the clot-capturing ability of the BNF, tested within the "caval" segment of the phantom, and the Greenfield, Vena Tech-LGM, and Simon nitinol filters, tested in the "iliac" segments. All filters were tested for flow disturbances before and after clot capture. The authors' results demonstrate that within an oversized IVC, the BNF creates less flow disturbance and is less occlusive with clot capture than biiliac filters. The BNF displayed a clot-capturing ability equal to that of biiliac filters. Thus, for patients with an oversized IVC, these results suggest that placement of a single intracaval BNF is preferable to biiliac placement of filters.