Chong Vincent F H, Zhou Jia-Yin, Khoo James B K, Huang Jing, Lim Tuan-Kay
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, Singapore 169608, Republic of Singapore.
Radiology. 2004 Jun;231(3):914-21. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2313030358.
Tumor volume was measured in 69 patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. On transverse nonenhanced T1-weighted and gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) images, segmentation was performed by means of seed growing and knowledge-based fuzzy clustering methods. Data were compared with those collected with the manual tracing method and analyzed for interoperator variance and interobserver reliability. There was no significant difference between the volumes determined with manual tracing or semiautomated segmentation (P >.05). On the volume level, Pearson correction coefficients were close for both the manual tracing and semiautomated methods. Significant differences in interoperator variance existed between the two methods on the pixel level (P <.05). Compared with manual tracing, the semiautomated method helped reduce interoperator variance and obtain higher interobserver reliability. Findings in the current study validate the use of semiautomated volume measurement methods for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
对69例鼻咽癌患者的肿瘤体积进行了测量。在横轴位非增强T1加权和钆增强T1加权磁共振(MR)图像上,采用种子生长法和基于知识的模糊聚类法进行分割。将数据与采用手动追踪法收集的数据进行比较,并分析操作者间差异和观察者间可靠性。手动追踪法和半自动分割法所确定的体积之间无显著差异(P>.05)。在体积水平上,手动追踪法和半自动法的Pearson校正系数相近。两种方法在像素水平上的操作者间差异存在显著差异(P<.05)。与手动追踪法相比,半自动法有助于减少操作者间差异并获得更高的观察者间可靠性。本研究结果验证了半自动体积测量方法在鼻咽癌中的应用。