Suppr超能文献

抗抑郁药物的使用:退伍军人管理局患者治疗中的精神科就诊情况是否存在差异?

Use of antidepressant medications: are there differences in psychiatric visits among patient treatments in the Veterans Administration?

作者信息

Hamed Alaa, Lee Austin, Ren Xinhua S, Miller Donald R, Cunningham Fran, Zhang Huan, Kazis Lewis E

机构信息

Health Outcomes Technologies, Health Services Department, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts 02118, USA.

出版信息

Med Care. 2004 Jun;42(6):551-9. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000128002.73998.87.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Information on the effectiveness of newer antidepressants like serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors in terms of healthcare utilization is limited. Treatment guidelines affect evaluation. Second-line medications are usually prescribed to patients with higher utilization.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to compare antidepressants within the Veterans Affairs (VA) healthcare system on the basis of the number of outpatient psychiatric visits for each class of antidepressants.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND SUBJECTS

We conducted a retrospective cohort design using precollected information from VA national databases from 1999 and 2000. The study identified 92,537 patients on serotonin specific reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), or tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs).

MEASURES

We stratified individual patients by the number of visits in the baseline year for each medication class. For each stratum, we created a dichotomized variable YK: Yk = 1 if there is a reduction of K visits or more and 0 if there is no reduction. We calculated the odds of reduction of psychiatric visits among the 3 classes of antidepressants.

RESULTS

TCAs and SSRIs were associated with greater odds of reduction compared with SNRIs at the level of 1 through 10 or 11 visits, respectively. SNRIs were associated with greater odds of reduction in visits at the level of 14, 16, or more visits compared with SSRIs and TCAs, respectively (P <0.05). SSRIs were associated with greater odds of reduction compared with TCAs at the level of 1 to 11 visits (P <0.05); there were no significant differences between the 2 classes above 11 visits.

CONCLUSION

Effectiveness research using databases should consider how medications are prescribed within systems. Treatment guidelines result in differences in severity and utilization among users of different medications.

摘要

背景

关于新型抗抑郁药(如5-羟色胺-去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂)在医疗保健利用方面的有效性信息有限。治疗指南会影响评估。二线药物通常开给利用率较高的患者。

目的

本研究的目的是在退伍军人事务(VA)医疗系统内,根据各类抗抑郁药的门诊精神科就诊次数比较抗抑郁药。

研究设计与对象

我们采用回顾性队列设计,使用1999年和2000年VA国家数据库中预先收集的信息。该研究确定了92537名使用5-羟色胺特异性再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)、5-羟色胺-去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂(SNRI)或三环类抗抑郁药(TCA)的患者。

措施

我们根据每种药物类别在基线年份的就诊次数对个体患者进行分层。对于每个阶层,我们创建了一个二分变量YK:如果就诊次数减少K次或更多,则Yk = 1;如果没有减少,则Yk = 0。我们计算了3类抗抑郁药中精神科就诊次数减少的几率。

结果

与SNRI相比,TCA和SSRI分别在1至10次或11次就诊水平上与更大的减少几率相关。与SSRI和TCA相比,SNRI分别在14次、16次或更多次就诊水平上与更大的就诊次数减少几率相关(P <0.05)。与TCA相比,SSRI在1至11次就诊水平上与更大的减少几率相关(P <0.05);在11次就诊以上,这两类药物之间没有显著差异。

结论

使用数据库进行的有效性研究应考虑系统内药物的处方方式。治疗指南导致不同药物使用者在严重程度和利用率方面存在差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验