Schieve Laura A, Rasmussen Sonja A, Buck Germaine M, Schendel Diana E, Reynolds Meredith A, Wright Victoria C
Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway NE, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA.
Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Jun;103(6):1154-63. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000124571.04890.67.
As assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) are increasingly used to overcome infertility, there is concern about the health of the children conceived. The empirical evidence for associations with outcomes related to child health is variable and should be evaluated with consideration of methodological shortcomings. Currently, there is convincing evidence that ART treatment may increase the risk of a few outcomes. Experimental laboratory studies document that various constituents in culture media affect various embryo characteristics both positively and negatively. Multiple-gestation pregnancy and birth are increased with ART, both because of multiple embryo transfer and embryo splitting. There is evidence of an increase in chromosomal abnormalities among pregnancies conceived using intracytoplasmic sperm injection and low birth weight and preterm delivery among singletons conceived with all types of ART; however, there remains uncertainty about whether these risks stem from the treatment or the parental infertility. For some outcomes, data of an increased risk with ART are suggestive at best largely because of lack of purposeful study of sufficient size and scope. These include specific perinatal morbidities, birth defects, developmental disabilities, and retinoblastoma. The evidence for an association between ART and spontaneous abortion is inconsistent and weak. There is inconclusive evidence that ART may be associated with genetic imprinting disorders. For childhood cancer, chronic conditions, learning and behavioral disorders, and reproductive effects there is insufficient empirical research to date, but given the data for more proximal outcomes, these outcomes merit further study. Future research needs to address the unique methodological challenges underlying study in this area.
随着辅助生殖技术(ARTs)越来越多地用于克服不孕症,人们对通过这些技术受孕的儿童的健康状况表示担忧。关于ARTs与儿童健康相关结果之间关联的实证证据并不一致,且应在考虑方法学缺陷的情况下进行评估。目前,有令人信服的证据表明ART治疗可能会增加某些结果的风险。实验性实验室研究表明,培养基中的各种成分对胚胎的各种特征既有正面影响也有负面影响。ARTs会增加多胎妊娠和分娩的几率,这既是因为多胚胎移植,也是因为胚胎分裂。有证据表明,使用卵胞浆内单精子注射技术受孕的孕妇中染色体异常的发生率增加,而在通过各种ART技术受孕的单胎妊娠中,低出生体重和早产的发生率增加;然而,这些风险是源于治疗本身还是父母的不孕症仍不确定。对于某些结果,ARTs增加风险的数据充其量只是具有启发性,这主要是因为缺乏足够规模和范围的针对性研究。这些结果包括特定的围产期发病率、出生缺陷、发育障碍和视网膜母细胞瘤。ARTs与自然流产之间关联的证据并不一致且很薄弱。关于ARTs可能与基因印记障碍有关的证据尚无定论。对于儿童癌症、慢性病、学习和行为障碍以及生殖方面的影响,目前尚无足够的实证研究,但鉴于更近期结果的数据,这些结果值得进一步研究。未来的研究需要应对该领域研究背后独特的方法学挑战。