Jones James H, Murphy Michael P, Dickson Robert L, Somerville Geoff G, Brizendine Edward J
Department of Emergency Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
Acad Emerg Med. 2004 Jun;11(6):707-9. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2003.12.026.
To prospectively quantify the number of unrecognized missed out-of-hospital intubations by ground paramedics using emergency physician verification as the criterion standard for verification of endotracheal tube placement.
The authors performed an observational, prospective study of consecutive intubated patients arriving by ground emergency medical services to two urban teaching hospitals. Endotracheal tube placement was verified by emergency physicians and evaluated by using a combination of direct visualization, esophageal detector device (EDD), colorimetric end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO(2)), and physical examination.
During the six-month study period, 208 out-of-hospital intubations by ground paramedics were enrolled, which included 160 (76.9%) medical patients and 48 (23.1%) trauma patients. A total of 12 (5.8%) endotracheal tubes were incorrectly placed outside the trachea. This comprised ten (6.3%) medical patients and two (4.2%) trauma patients. Of the 12 misplaced endotracheal tubes, a verification device (ETCO(2) or EDD) was used in three cases (25%) and not used in nine cases (75%).
The rate of unrecognized, misplaced out-of-hospital intubations in this urban, midwestern setting was 5.8%. This is more consistent with results of prior out-of-hospital studies that used field verification and is discordant with the only other study to exclusively use emergency physician verification performed on arrival to the emergency department.
以前瞻性方式,将急诊医生的核实作为气管插管位置核实的标准,对地面护理人员未识别出的院外插管失误数量进行量化。
作者对通过地面紧急医疗服务连续抵达两家城市教学医院的插管患者进行了一项观察性前瞻性研究。气管插管位置由急诊医生核实,并通过直接可视化、食管探测器装置(EDD)、比色法呼气末二氧化碳(ETCO₂)和体格检查相结合的方式进行评估。
在为期六个月的研究期间,纳入了地面护理人员进行的208次院外插管,其中包括160名(76.9%)内科患者和48名(23.1%)创伤患者。共有12根(5.8%)气管插管误置于气管外。这包括10名(6.3%)内科患者和2名(4.2%)创伤患者。在12根误置的气管插管中,3例(25%)使用了核实装置(ETCO₂或EDD),9例(75%)未使用。
在这个中西部城市环境中,未识别出的院外插管误置率为5.8%。这与之前使用现场核实的院外研究结果更为一致,与另一项仅在抵达急诊科时使用急诊医生核实的研究结果不一致。