Suppr超能文献

来自不同基因表达微阵列平台的数据具有可比性吗?

Are data from different gene expression microarray platforms comparable?

作者信息

Järvinen Anna-Kaarina, Hautaniemi Sampsa, Edgren Henrik, Auvinen Petri, Saarela Janna, Kallioniemi Olli-P, Monni Outi

机构信息

Biomedicum Biochip Center, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 63, Room A415b, 00014 University of Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

Genomics. 2004 Jun;83(6):1164-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2004.01.004.

Abstract

Many commercial and custom-made microarray formats are routinely used for large-scale gene expression surveys. Here, we sought to determine the level of concordance between microarray platforms by analyzing breast cancer cell lines with in situ synthesized oligonucleotide arrays (Affymetrix HG-U95v2), commercial cDNA microarrays (Agilent Human 1 cDNA), and custom-made cDNA microarrays from a sequence-validated 13K cDNA library. Gene expression data from the commercial platforms showed good correlations across the experiments (r = 0.78-0.86), whereas the correlations between the custom-made and either of the two commercial platforms were lower (r = 0.62-0.76). Discrepant findings were due to clone errors on the custom-made microarrays, old annotations, or unknown causes. Even within platform, there can be several ways to analyze data that may influence the correlation between platforms. Our results indicate that combining data from different microarray platforms is not straightforward. Variability of the data represents a challenge for developing future diagnostic applications of microarrays.

摘要

许多商业和定制的微阵列格式经常用于大规模基因表达研究。在此,我们试图通过使用原位合成寡核苷酸阵列(Affymetrix HG-U95v2)、商业cDNA微阵列(安捷伦人类1 cDNA)以及来自经序列验证的13K cDNA文库的定制cDNA微阵列分析乳腺癌细胞系,来确定微阵列平台之间的一致性水平。来自商业平台的基因表达数据在各实验之间显示出良好的相关性(r = 0.78 - 0.86),而定制微阵列与两个商业平台中任何一个之间的相关性较低(r = 0.62 - 0.76)。差异结果归因于定制微阵列上的克隆错误、旧注释或未知原因。即使在同一平台内,也有几种分析数据的方法可能会影响平台之间的相关性。我们的结果表明,整合来自不同微阵列平台的数据并非易事。数据的变异性对开发微阵列未来的诊断应用构成了挑战。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验