Kingstone Alan, Tipper Christine, Ristic Jelena, Ngan Elton
Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z4.
Brain Cogn. 2004 Jul;55(2):269-71. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2004.02.037.
For the past several years it has been thought that cues, such as eye direction, can trigger reflexive shifts in attention because of their biological relevance and their specialized neural architecture. However, very recently, reported that other stimuli, such as arrows, trigger reflexive shifts in attention in a manner that is behaviourally identical to those triggered by eyes. Nevertheless these authors speculated that reflexive orienting to gaze direction may be subserved by a neural system-the superior temporal sulcus (STS)-that is specialized for processing eyes. The present study presents fMRI data that provide direct and compelling empirical support to this proposal. Subjects were presented with fixation stimuli that, based on instruction, could be perceived as eyes or as another type of directional cue. Both produced equivalent shifts in reflexive attention, replicating Ristic et al. However, the neural systems subserving the two forms of orienting were not equivalent-with the STS being engaged exceptionally when the fixation stimulus was perceived as eyes.
在过去的几年里,人们一直认为诸如眼睛方向等线索,由于其生物学相关性和专门的神经结构,能够引发注意力的反射性转移。然而,就在最近,有报道称其他刺激,比如箭头,也能以一种在行为上与眼睛引发的注意力转移相同的方式,引发注意力的反射性转移。尽管如此,这些作者推测,对注视方向的反射性定向可能由一个专门用于处理眼睛的神经系统——颞上沟(STS)——来支持。本研究呈现了功能磁共振成像(fMRI)数据,为这一观点提供了直接且有说服力的实证支持。向受试者呈现固定刺激,根据指示,这些刺激可以被视为眼睛或另一种方向线索。两者都能产生同等程度的反射性注意力转移,这与里斯蒂克等人的研究结果一致。然而,支持这两种定向形式的神经系统并不相同——当固定刺激被视为眼睛时,颞上沟会特别活跃。