Jacobs Michael R, Bajaksouzian Saralee, Windau Anne, Good Caryn E, Lin Gengrong, Pankuch Glenn A, Appelbaum Peter C
Department of Pathology, Case Western Reserve University and University Hospitals of Cleveland, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
Clin Lab Med. 2004 Jun;24(2):503-30. doi: 10.1016/j.cll.2004.03.008.
Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters were used to interpret susceptibility data for the oral agents tested in a clinically meaningful way. Among S pneumoniae isolates, >99% were susceptible to respiratory fluoroquinolones, 91.6% to amoxicillin, 92.1% to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (95.2% at the extended-release formulation breakpoint), 90.6% to clindamycin, 80.4% to doxycycline, 71.0% to azithromycin, 72.3% to clarithromycin, 71.8% to cefprozil and cefdinir, 72.6% to cefuroxime axetil, 66.3% to cexime, 63.7% to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, and 19.7% to cefaclor. Among H influenzae isolates, 28.6% were b-lactamase positive, but virtually all were susceptible to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (98.3%, with 99.8% at the extended-release formulation breakpoint), cexime (100%), and uoroquinolones (99.8%), whereas 93.5% were susceptible to cefdinir, 82.8% to cefuroxime axetil, 78.1% to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, 70.2% to amoxicillin, 25.1% to doxycycline, 23.2% to cefprozil, and 5% to cefaclor, azithromycin and clarithromycin. Most isolates of M catarrhalis were resistant to amoxicillin, cefaclor, cefprozil, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. Thus significant b-lactam and macrolide/azalide resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae and b-lactamase production and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole resistance in untypeable Haemophilus influenzae are still present. The results of this study should therefore be applied to clinical practice based on the clinical presentation of the patient, the probability of the patient's having a bacterial rather than a viral infection, the natural history of the disease, the potential of pathogens to be susceptible to various oral antimicrobial agents, the potential for cross-resistance between agents with S pneumoniae, and the potential for pathogens to develop further resistance. Antibiotics should be used judiciously to maintain remaining activity and chosen carefully based on activity determined by pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic-based breakpoints to avoid these bacteria developing further resistance, particularly to fluoroquinolones.
药代动力学/药效学参数被用于以具有临床意义的方式解释所测试口服药物的药敏数据。在肺炎链球菌分离株中,>99%对呼吸喹诺酮类药物敏感,91.6%对阿莫西林敏感,92.1%对阿莫西林/克拉维酸敏感(在缓释制剂断点处为95.2%),90.6%对克林霉素敏感,80.4%对多西环素敏感,71.0%对阿奇霉素敏感,72.3%对克拉霉素敏感,71.8%对头孢丙烯和头孢地尼敏感,72.6%对头孢呋辛酯敏感,66.3%对头孢克肟敏感,63.7%对甲氧苄啶/磺胺甲恶唑敏感,19.7%对头孢克洛敏感。在流感嗜血杆菌分离株中,28.6%为β-内酰胺酶阳性,但几乎所有菌株对阿莫西林/克拉维酸(98.3%,在缓释制剂断点处为99.8%)、头孢克肟(100%)和喹诺酮类药物(99.8%)敏感,而93.5%对头孢地尼敏感,82.8%对头孢呋辛酯敏感,78.1%对甲氧苄啶/磺胺甲恶唑敏感,70.2%对阿莫西林敏感,25.1%对多西环素敏感,23.2%对头孢丙烯敏感,5%对头孢克洛、阿奇霉素和克拉霉素敏感。大多数卡他莫拉菌分离株对阿莫西林、头孢克洛、头孢丙烯和甲氧苄啶/磺胺甲恶唑耐药。因此,肺炎链球菌中显著的β-内酰胺和大环内酯/氮杂内酯耐药以及不可分型流感嗜血杆菌中的β-内酰胺酶产生和甲氧苄啶/磺胺甲恶唑耐药仍然存在。因此,本研究结果应根据患者的临床表现、患者发生细菌感染而非病毒感染的可能性、疾病的自然史、病原体对各种口服抗菌药物敏感的可能性、肺炎链球菌感染中不同药物之间交叉耐药的可能性以及病原体产生进一步耐药的可能性应用于临床实践。抗生素应谨慎使用以维持其剩余活性,并根据基于药代动力学/药效学断点确定的活性仔细选择,以避免这些细菌产生进一步耐药,尤其是对喹诺酮类药物的耐药。