Mills Anne, Palmer Natasha, Gilson Lucy, McIntyre Di, Schneider Helen, Sinanovic Edina, Wadee Haroon
Health Economics and Financing Programme, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM), Keppel Street, WC1E 7HT London, UK.
Soc Sci Med. 2004 Sep;59(5):931-43. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.12.015.
Despite the emphasis placed during the last two decades on public delivery of comprehensive and equitable primary care (PC) to developing country populations, coverage remains far from universal and the quality often poor. Users frequently patronise private providers, ranging from informal drug sellers to trained professionals. Interest is increasing internationally in the potential for making better use of private providers, including contractual approaches. The research aim was to examine the performance of different models of PC provision, in order to identify their strengths and weaknesses from the perspective of a government wishing to develop an overall strategy for improving PC provision. Models evaluated were: (a) South African general practitioners (district surgeons) providing services under public contracts; (b) clinics provided in Lesotho under a sub-contract between a construction company and a South African health care company; (c) GP services provided through an Independent Practitioner Association to low income insured workers and families; (d) a private clinic chain serving low income insured and uninsured workers and their families; and (e) for comparative purposes, South African public clinics. Performance was analysed in terms of provider cost and quality (of infrastructure, treatment practices, acceptability to patients and communities), allowing for differences in services and case-mix. The diversity of the arrangements made direct comparisons difficult, however, clear differences were identified between the models and conclusions drawn on their relative performance and the influences upon performance. The study findings demonstrate that contextual features strongly influence provider performance, and that a crude public/private comparison is not helpful. Key issues in contract design likely to influence performance are highlighted. Finally, the study argues that there is a need before contracting out service provision to consider how the performance of private providers might change when the context within which they are working changes with the introduction of a contract.
尽管在过去二十年里一直强调向发展中国家民众提供全面且公平的公共初级医疗服务(PC),但其覆盖范围仍远未普及,质量也常常很差。患者经常光顾从非正式药品销售商到受过培训的专业人员等各类私人医疗服务提供者。国际上对更好地利用私人医疗服务提供者(包括采用合同制方法)的潜力的兴趣与日俱增。本研究的目的是考察不同初级医疗服务提供模式的表现,以便从希望制定改善初级医疗服务提供总体战略的政府角度确定其优缺点。所评估的模式包括:(a)南非全科医生(地区外科医生)根据公共合同提供服务;(b)莱索托一家建筑公司与一家南非医疗保健公司签订分包合同后开设的诊所;(c)通过独立从业者协会向低收入参保工人及其家庭提供的全科医生服务;(d)一家为低收入参保和未参保工人及其家庭服务的私人连锁诊所;以及(e)作为对比的南非公共诊所。从提供者成本和质量(基础设施、治疗方法、患者和社区接受度)方面对表现进行了分析,同时考虑到服务和病例组合的差异。尽管这些安排的多样性使得直接比较变得困难,但仍明确确定了各模式之间的差异,并就其相对表现以及对表现的影响得出了结论。研究结果表明,背景特征对提供者表现有强烈影响,简单的公立/私立比较并无帮助。文中突出了合同设计中可能影响表现的关键问题。最后,该研究认为在将服务提供外包之前,有必要考虑当私人提供者的工作环境因引入合同而发生变化时,其表现可能会如何改变。