Lin Being-Chuan, Chen Ray-Jade, Fang Jen-Feng, Hsu Yu-Pao, Kao Yi-Chin, Kao Jung-Liang
Division of Trauma and Emergency, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University, Kweishan, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
J Trauma. 2004 Apr;56(4):774-8. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000087644.90727.df.
Major duct injury is the principal determinant of outcome for patients with pancreatic trauma, and there are a number of therapeutic choices available specific to the location of the insult. We report a series of blunt major pancreatic injury cases, with a review of the different procedures used and a discussion of the results.
A total of 48 cases of blunt major pancreatic injury treated during a 10-year period at one trauma center were reviewed retrospectively. Diagnosis and assessment of injury severity were based on imaging studies and proved by surgical findings. Charts were reviewed to establish the mechanism of injury, surgical indications and imaging studies, management strategy, and outcome.
Of the 32 grade III patients, 19 underwent distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy, 8 had pancreatectomy with preservation of the spleen, and 2 received a pancreatic duct stent, with the remaining 3 individuals undergoing nonsurgical treatment, pancreaticojejunostomy, and drainage alone, respectively. The grade III complication rate was 60.6%. Of the 14 grade IV patients, 4 underwent drainage alone because of the severity of the associated injuries, 4 underwent pancreaticojejunostomy, 3 had distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy, and 1 underwent distal pancreatectomy. The two remaining patients received a pancreatic duct stent. The grade IV complication rate was 53.8%. The Whipple procedure was performed for two grade V patients; one died subsequently. For all 48 patients, intraabdominal abscess was the most common morbidity (n = 11) followed, in order of prevalence, by major duct stricture (n = 4), pancreatitis (n = 2), pseudocyst (n = 2), pancreatic fistula (n = 1), and biliary fistula (n = 1). All stented cases developed complications, with one dying and three experiencing major duct stricture.
The complication rate for our cases of blunt major pancreatic injury was high (62.2%), especially when treatment was delayed more than 24 hours; the same result was also noted for cases transferred from other institutions. Distal pancreatectomy with spleen preservation had a lower complication rate (22.2%) compared with other procedures and is suggested for grade III and grade IV injuries. Magnetic resonance pancreatography was unreliable early after injury but was effective in the chronic stage. Although pancreatic duct stenting can be used to treat posttraumatic pancreatic fistula and pseudocyst, the major duct stricture in the chronic stage of recovery and the risk of sepsis in the acute stage must be overcome.
主胰管损伤是胰腺创伤患者预后的主要决定因素,针对损伤部位有多种治疗选择。我们报告了一系列钝性主胰管损伤病例,回顾了所采用的不同手术方法并讨论了结果。
回顾性分析了一家创伤中心在10年期间治疗的48例钝性主胰管损伤病例。根据影像学检查诊断并评估损伤严重程度,并经手术结果证实。查阅病历以确定损伤机制、手术指征和影像学检查、治疗策略及预后。
32例Ⅲ级患者中,19例行胰体尾切除术加脾切除术,8例行保留脾脏的胰切除术,2例行胰管支架置入术,其余3例分别接受非手术治疗、胰空肠吻合术和单纯引流术。Ⅲ级并发症发生率为60.6%。14例Ⅳ级患者中,4例因合并伤严重仅行引流术,4例行胰空肠吻合术,3例行胰体尾切除术加脾切除术,1例行胰体尾切除术。其余2例患者行胰管支架置入术。Ⅳ级并发症发生率为53.8%。2例Ⅴ级患者行惠普尔手术;其中1例随后死亡。48例患者中,腹腔内脓肿是最常见的并发症(n = 11),其次依次为主要胰管狭窄(n = 4)、胰腺炎(n = 2)、假性囊肿(n = 2)、胰瘘(n = 1)和胆瘘(n = 1)。所有置入支架的病例均出现并发症,1例死亡,3例出现主要胰管狭窄。
我们的钝性主胰管损伤病例并发症发生率较高(62.2%),尤其是治疗延迟超过24小时的病例;从其他机构转诊的病例也有同样的结果。与其他手术相比,保留脾脏的胰体尾切除术并发症发生率较低(22.2%),建议用于Ⅲ级和Ⅳ级损伤。磁共振胰胆管造影在损伤早期不可靠,但在慢性期有效。虽然胰管支架置入术可用于治疗创伤后胰瘘和假性囊肿,但必须克服恢复期慢性期的主要胰管狭窄和急性期的脓毒症风险。