Kern W V, De With K, Gonnermann C, Strehl E, Bergner Jobst, Höffken Gert, Dörje Frank, Daschner Frank, Steib-Bauert Michaela, Haber Manfred, Herrmann Matthias, Hartmann Michael, Straube Eberhard, Bühner Reinhard, Rothe Ulrich, Salzberger Bernd, Marre Reinhard, Kern Peter
Division of Infectious Diseases, Dept. of Medicine, Freiburg University Hospital, Hugstetter Strasse 55, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany.
Infection. 2004 Jun;32(3):157-62. doi: 10.1007/s15010-004-3159-0.
A previous study has shown considerable variation in glycopeptide use from 1992 through 1994 among four university hospitals in southern Germany. Active antimicrobial management in one of the hospitals was associated with the containment of glycopeptide consumption in the medical and surgical service at < 1.5 defined daily doses (DDD)/100 patient days in the subsequent period. In the present study, more recent data on comparative glycopeptide use in German university hospitals were analyzed.
Hospital pharmacy records from 1998 through 2000 were evaluated. The number of DDD (definition according to the World Health Organization [WHO]/Anatomic and Therapeutic Classification [ATC] index) per 100 patient days was calculated to compare glycopeptide use in different medical and surgical service areas between eight German university hospitals.
The 3-year averages in recent glycopeptide use for the eight hospitals ranged between 1.3 and 8.8 DDD/100 patient days in the medical services, and between 0.7 and 1.8 DDD/100 patient days in the surgical services. Only one of the eight hospitals showed medical service glycopeptide use of < 1.5 DDD/100 patient days. In most hospitals, glycopeptide use was higher in the medical intensive care units (ICU) (median 8.6; range 4.3 to 12 DDD/100 patient days, data for the year 2000) than in the surgical ICUs (median 6.7; range 1.2 to 8.6 DDD/100 patient days, data for the year 2000). High use was also observed for hematology-oncology services (median 7.5; range 2.7 to 15.7 DDD/100 patient days, data for the year 2000).
These recent data from a larger hospital sample confirm large variations in glycopeptide use, identify hematology-oncology services as a significant prescribing source along with ICUs, and indicate areas of probable overuse of glycopeptide antibiotics. The data may be useful as a benchmark for further focused drug use control interventions.
先前的一项研究表明,1992年至1994年间,德国南部四家大学医院的糖肽类药物使用情况存在显著差异。其中一家医院积极的抗菌药物管理措施与随后时期内科和外科服务中糖肽类药物消耗量控制在低于1.5限定日剂量(DDD)/100患者日相关。在本研究中,分析了德国大学医院近期糖肽类药物使用情况的比较数据。
对1998年至2000年的医院药房记录进行评估。计算每100患者日的DDD数量(根据世界卫生组织[WHO]/解剖治疗学分类[ATC]索引定义),以比较德国八家大学医院不同内科和外科服务领域的糖肽类药物使用情况。
八家医院近期糖肽类药物使用的3年平均值在内科服务中为1.3至8.8 DDD/100患者日,在外科服务中为0.7至1.8 DDD/100患者日。八家医院中只有一家内科服务的糖肽类药物使用量低于1.5 DDD/100患者日。在大多数医院,内科重症监护病房(ICU)的糖肽类药物使用量(2000年数据,中位数8.6;范围4.3至12 DDD/100患者日)高于外科ICU(2000年数据,中位数6.7;范围1.2至8.6 DDD/100患者日)。血液肿瘤学服务的使用量也很高(2000年数据,中位数7.5;范围2.7至15.7 DDD/100患者日)。
来自更大医院样本的这些近期数据证实了糖肽类药物使用的巨大差异,确定血液肿瘤学服务与ICU一样是重要的处方来源,并指出了糖肽类抗生素可能过度使用的领域。这些数据可作为进一步针对性药物使用控制干预措施的基准。