Melin Virginie, Perrett David
Department of Medicine, Barts & The London, Queen Mary's School of Medicine & Dentistry, West Smithfield, GB-London EC1A 7BE, UK.
Electrophoresis. 2004 Jun;25(10-11):1503-10. doi: 10.1002/elps.200305875.
Separations of human urine by microemulsion electrokinetic chromatography (MEEKC) and micellar electrokinetic capillary chromatography (MEKC) with respect to resolution, migration times and efficiencies were optimized and compared. The optimised MEEKC and MEKC methods were simple and fast, both of which are excellent characteristics for the complex separations required in clinical and biomedical studies. However, resolution in MEKC was significantly greater than in MEEKC although migration times were 30% faster for the optimised MEEKC method. In addition, a faster analysis method (short-end injection) specifically for routine screening purposes was also investigated. With both MEEKC and MEKC modes, this provided short separations (less than 4 min for urine) with no major compromise in resolution. In conclusion, we found that MEEKC offered no real advantage over MEKC for urine analysis.
通过微乳液电动色谱法(MEEKC)和胶束电动毛细管色谱法(MEKC)对人尿液进行分离,在分离度、迁移时间和柱效方面进行了优化和比较。优化后的MEEKC和MEKC方法简单快速,这两个特性对于临床和生物医学研究中所需的复杂分离而言都是极佳的。然而,尽管优化后的MEEKC方法迁移时间快30%,但MEKC中的分离度明显高于MEEKC。此外,还研究了一种专门用于常规筛查目的的更快分析方法(短端进样)。在MEEKC和MEKC模式下,这都能实现短时间分离(尿液分析少于4分钟),且分离度没有重大损失。总之,我们发现对于尿液分析,MEEKC相较于MEKC并无实际优势。