Ravizza Susan M, Delgado Mauricio R, Chein Jason M, Becker James T, Fiez Julie A
Department of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA.
Neuroimage. 2004 Jun;22(2):562-73. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.01.039.
Neuroimaging studies of working memory have revealed two sites in the left supramarginal gyrus that may support the short-term storage of phonological information. Activation in the left dorsal aspect of the inferior parietal cortex (DIPC) has been observed in contrasts of working memory load, whereas activation in the ventral aspect of the inferior parietal cortex (VIPC) has been found primarily in contrast of information type (verbal vs. nonverbal). Our goal was to determine whether these two areas are functionally distinct or if instead they are part of a homogeneous region with large variations in the focus of peak activity. Toward this end, we used fMRI to assess the neural response in two working memory tasks (N-back and item recognition) in which we also manipulated memory load and the type of information to be recalled (verbal vs. nonverbal). We found both DIPC and VIPC activation in the same group of subjects and further demonstrated that they have differential sensitivity to our experimental factors. Only the DIPC showed robust load effects, whereas only the VIPC showed reliable effects of information type. These results help to account for the differences observed in between-subject comparisons, and they indicate that the two regions are functionally dissociable. In contrast to the DIPC, activity of the VIPC was also recruited in the fixation and low-load conditions, a surprising result that has not been fully explored in prior studies. Despite their distinctive patterns of performance, neither of these regions displayed a pattern of activity that entirely corresponds to common assumptions of a dedicated phonological short-term store (STS). Instead, we hypothesize that the DIPC may support domain-general executive processes, while the VIPC may support phonological encoding-recoding processes central to a variety of language tasks.
工作记忆的神经影像学研究揭示了左顶上小叶中的两个区域,它们可能支持语音信息的短期存储。在工作记忆负荷对比中,已观察到左下顶叶皮质背侧(DIPC)激活,而左下顶叶皮质腹侧(VIPC)激活主要在信息类型(言语与非言语)对比中发现。我们的目标是确定这两个区域在功能上是否不同,或者它们是否是一个同质区域的一部分,只是峰值活动焦点存在很大差异。为此,我们使用功能磁共振成像(fMRI)评估两项工作记忆任务(n-back和项目识别)中的神经反应,在这些任务中我们还操纵了记忆负荷和要回忆的信息类型(言语与非言语)。我们在同一组受试者中发现了DIPC和VIPC的激活,并进一步证明它们对我们的实验因素具有不同的敏感性。只有DIPC表现出强烈的负荷效应,而只有VIPC表现出可靠的信息类型效应。这些结果有助于解释在受试者间比较中观察到的差异,并且表明这两个区域在功能上是可分离的。与DIPC不同,在注视和低负荷条件下也会募集VIPC的活动,这一令人惊讶的结果在先前研究中尚未得到充分探索。尽管它们表现出独特的模式,但这两个区域均未显示出完全符合专用语音短期存储(STS)常见假设的活动模式。相反,我们假设DIPC可能支持领域通用的执行过程,而VIPC可能支持各种语言任务核心的语音编码-重新编码过程。