Chen Allen M, Meric-Bernstam Funda, Hunt Kelly K, Thames Howard D, Oswald Mary Jane, Outlaw Elesyia D, Strom Eric A, McNeese Marsha D, Kuerer Henry M, Ross Merrick I, Singletary S Eva, Ames Fredrick C, Feig Barry W, Sahin Aysegul A, Perkins George H, Schechter Naomi R, Hortobagyi Gabriel N, Buchholz Thomas A
Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
J Clin Oncol. 2004 Jun 15;22(12):2303-12. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.09.062.
To determine patterns of local-regional recurrence (LRR) and ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) among patients treated with breast conservation therapy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Between 1987 and 2000, 340 cases of breast cancer were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by conservative surgery and radiation therapy. Clinical stage at diagnosis (according to the 2003 American Joint Committee on Cancer system) was I in 4%, II in 58%, and III in 38% of patients. Only 4% had positive surgical margins.
At a median follow-up period of 60 months (range, 10 to 180 months), 29 patients had developed LRR, 16 of which were IBTRs. Five-year actuarial rates of IBTR-free and LRR-free survival were 95% and 91%, respectively. Variables that positively correlated with IBTR and LRR were clinical N2 or N3 disease, pathologic residual tumor larger than 2 cm, a multifocal pattern of residual disease, and lymphovascular space invasion in the specimen. The presence of any one of these factors was associated with 5-year actuarial IBTR-free and LRR-free survival rates of 87% to 91% and 77% to 84%, respectively. Initial T category (T1-2 v T3-4) correlated with LRR but did not correlate with IBTR (5-year IBTR-free rates of 96% v 92%, respectively, P =.19).
Breast conservation therapy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy results in acceptably low rates of LRR and IBTR in appropriately selected patients, even those with T3 or T4 disease. Advanced nodal involvement at diagnosis, residual tumor larger than 2 cm, multifocal residual disease, and lymphovascular space invasion predict higher rates of LRR and IBTR.
确定接受新辅助化疗后行保乳治疗的患者局部区域复发(LRR)和同侧乳腺肿瘤复发(IBTR)的模式。
1987年至2000年间,340例乳腺癌患者接受了新辅助化疗,随后进行保乳手术和放射治疗。诊断时的临床分期(根据2003年美国癌症联合委员会系统):4%的患者为I期,58%为II期,38%为III期。仅4%的患者手术切缘阳性。
中位随访期为60个月(范围10至180个月),29例患者发生LRR,其中16例为IBTR。无IBTR和无LRR生存的5年精算率分别为95%和91%。与IBTR和LRR呈正相关的变量包括临床N2或N3期疾病、病理残留肿瘤大于2 cm、残留疾病的多灶性模式以及标本中的淋巴管浸润。存在这些因素中的任何一项,5年无IBTR和无LRR生存精算率分别为87%至91%和77%至84%。初始T分期(T1-2与T3-4)与LRR相关,但与IBTR无关(无IBTR的5年率分别为96%和92%,P = 0.19)。
新辅助化疗后行保乳治疗,在适当选择的患者中,即使是T3或T4期疾病的患者,LRR和IBTR发生率也低至可接受水平。诊断时晚期淋巴结受累、残留肿瘤大于2 cm、多灶性残留疾病以及淋巴管浸润预示着更高的LRR和IBTR发生率。