Suppr超能文献

Comparison between degree of carotid stenosis observed at angiography and in histological examination.

作者信息

Benes V, Netuka D, Mandys V, Vrabec M, Mohapl M, Benes V, Kramár F

机构信息

1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Central Military Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.

出版信息

Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2004 Jul;146(7):671-7. doi: 10.1007/s00701-004-0279-3. Epub 2004 May 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The generally accepted indications for carotid endarterectomy are the clinical picture and degree of per cent stenosis of the carotid artery. Despite the fact that stenosis measurement is defined, the methods vary considerably. The correlation of particular methods, especially angiography and duplex sonography, has been repeatedly demonstrated. However, the correlation between any technique and true anatomical stenosis, as evaluated on the surgical specimen, has been only anecdotally reported.

METHOD

During carotid endarterectomy, the atherosclerotic plaque was removed in one piece and subsequently stored and histologically processed. The histological slides were evaluated under an optical microscope, scanned and the slide with maximum stenosis was determined using a planimetric program. Both the minimal lumen area and the area of the whole plaque were measured. The stenosis was calculated using the planimetric method. On the maximum stenosis slice, the minimal diameter and the diameter of the whole plaque were also measured. Angiographic images were scanned and the per cent stenoses were remeasured, according to the NASCET and ECST criteria. In total, of 147 cases, all above-mentioned parameters were obtained. Student's t tests for paired samples were used to evaluate the results.

FINDINGS

The t-tests indicated significant differences between the per cent stenosis as measured on the anatomical specimen and on the angiogram (p<0.05). The results indicate that the angiographic measurement underestimates the degree of in-situ anatomical stenosis. The underestimation was more marked the less the degree of stenosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study finds that per cent stenosis measurement obtained by angiography with NASCET or ECST methods does not reliably reflect the anatomical degree of per cent stenosis, which makes questionable the rigorous following of percentage stenosis using angiography as the sole indicator for carotid endarterectomy in all cases.

摘要

相似文献

1
Comparison between degree of carotid stenosis observed at angiography and in histological examination.
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2004 Jul;146(7):671-7. doi: 10.1007/s00701-004-0279-3. Epub 2004 May 17.
3
Accuracy of angiography and Doppler ultrasonography in the detection of carotid stenosis: a histopathological study of 123 cases.
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2006 May;148(5):511-20; discussion 520. doi: 10.1007/s00701-006-0756-y. Epub 2006 Mar 8.
6
Measuring carotid stenosis. Time for a reappraisal.
Stroke. 1993 Sep;24(9):1292-6. doi: 10.1161/01.str.24.9.1292.
10
Duplex sonographic criteria for measuring carotid stenoses.
J Clin Ultrasound. 2002 Jun;30(5):275-81. doi: 10.1002/jcu.10078.

引用本文的文献

4
Optical Coherence Tomography in Cerebrovascular Disease: Open up New Horizons.
Transl Stroke Res. 2023 Apr;14(2):137-145. doi: 10.1007/s12975-022-01023-6. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
6
Atherosclerotic plaque imaging by carotid MRI.
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2009 Jan;11(1):70-7. doi: 10.1007/s11886-009-0011-2.
7
Cross-sectional vascular imaging with CT and MR angiography.
J Nucl Cardiol. 2006 May-Jun;13(3):385-401. doi: 10.1016/j.nuclcard.2006.03.013.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验