Kempton T, Forehand R
Department of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens 30602.
Behav Res Ther. 1992 Sep;30(5):533-6. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(92)90037-h.
The purpose of the present study was to compare incarcerated juvenile sex offenders to incarcerated youth who committed confrontational but nonsex offenses, and to those youth who committed only nonconfrontational, nonsex offenses. Furthermore, comparisons were made between two subtypes of sex offenders: those youth convicted for rape or sodomy vs those convicted for child molestation. Eighty-three male juvenile delinquents served as participants. Teachers within the correctional facility completed an instrument which allowed the examination of the two areas of interest: externalizing problems and internalizing problems. The results indicated that sex offenders generally, and particularly those who had committed only sex offenses, were perceived as having fewer externalizing and internalizing problems. No differences emerged between the two subtypes of sex offenders. Implications, as well as limitations, of the findings are discussed.
本研究的目的是将被监禁的青少年性犯罪者与实施对抗性但非性犯罪的被监禁青少年以及仅实施非对抗性、非性犯罪的青少年进行比较。此外,还对两类性犯罪者进行了比较:那些因强奸或鸡奸被定罪的青少年与那些因猥亵儿童被定罪的青少年。83名男性青少年罪犯参与了研究。教养机构内的教师完成了一份调查问卷,该问卷可用于考察两个感兴趣的领域:外化问题和内化问题。结果表明,性犯罪者总体上,尤其是那些仅实施性犯罪的人,被认为存在较少的外化问题和内化问题。两类性犯罪者之间未出现差异。文中讨论了研究结果的意义及局限性。