Suppr超能文献

急性心肌梗死中的溶栓治疗或经皮冠状动脉介入治疗

[Thrombolysis or percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarct].

作者信息

Mihatov Sime

机构信息

Zavod za bolesti srca i krvnih zila, Interna klinika Medicinskog fakulteta u Zagrebu, Klinicka bolnica Dubrava, Avenija Gojka Suska 6 10000 Zagreb, Hrvatska.

出版信息

Acta Med Croatica. 2004;58(2):139-42.

Abstract

Reperfusion therapy in acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction includes thrombolytic therapy and primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (pPTCA) or primary coronary intervention (pPCI). Many clinical trials have been done to compare the efficacy of treatment of patients with acute myocardial infarction with thrombolytic therapy vs. primary coronary angioplasty. A meta-analysis of 23 randomized trials including 7739 patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) showed better results with pPCI in reducing overall short-term death (7% vs. 9%, p = 0.0002), non-fatal reinfarction (2.5% vs. 6.8%, p < 0.0001), death excluding cardiogenic shock (5% vs. 7, p = 0.0003) and combined endpoint of death, non-fatal reinfarction and stroke (8% vs. 14%, p < 0.0001). Primary PCI was better than thrombolytic therapy irrespective of the type of thrombolytic agent used even then when reperfusion was delayed because of patient transfer to a corresponding teriary center for primary PCI. Primary PCI is more effective than thrombolytic therapy for the treatment of ST-segment elevation AMI.

摘要

急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死的再灌注治疗包括溶栓治疗和直接经皮冠状动脉腔内血管成形术(pPTCA)或直接冠状动脉介入治疗(pPCI)。已经进行了许多临床试验来比较急性心肌梗死患者溶栓治疗与直接冠状动脉成形术的治疗效果。一项对23项随机试验(涉及7739例急性心肌梗死患者)的荟萃分析表明,pPCI在降低总体短期死亡率(7%对9%,p = 0.0002)、非致命性再梗死(2.5%对6.8%,p < 0.0001)、不包括心源性休克的死亡率(5%对7%,p = 0.0003)以及死亡、非致命性再梗死和中风的联合终点(8%对14%,p < 0.0001)方面效果更好。即使由于患者被转至相应的三级中心进行直接PCI而导致再灌注延迟,直接PCI仍然优于溶栓治疗,而与所使用的溶栓剂类型无关。直接PCI在治疗ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死方面比溶栓治疗更有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验